Medicare Enrolled

Dr. John Thomas, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · San Antonio, TX
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
8401 DATAPOINT DR, San Antonio, TX 78229
2106167700
In practice since 2006 (20 years)
NPI: 1871560193 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Thomas from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Thomas? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Thomas

Dr. John Thomas is a radiation oncology specialist in San Antonio, TX, with 20 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Thomas performed 4,053 Medicare services across 984 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Thomas received a total of $7,357 from 20 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 82 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Thomas is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice ▲ Top 23% volume in TX $7,357 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
4,053
Medicare services
Top 23% in TX for radiation oncology
984
Unique beneficiaries
$11
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~203 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 3,050 $0 $0
Chest X-ray, 1 view 275 $6 $35
Use of a drug to induce depression of consciousness by physician performing a procedure (5 years or older), initial 15 minutes 115 $9 $98
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 77 $66 $353
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 66 $58 $337
Fluoroscopic guidance for insertion or removal of central vein access device 60 $14 $72
Ultrasonic guidance for blood vessel access 59 $11 $56
Review by radiologist of ct guidance for needle placement 40 $53 $221
Aspiration of fluid from chest cavity using imaging guidance 36 $84 $450
Chest X-ray, 2 views 24 $8 $42
Drainage of fluid from abdominal cavity using imaging guidance 23 $79 $426
Insertion of tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 22 $196 $1,032
Biopsy and aspiration of bone marrow sample for diagnosis 22 $58 $305
Insertion of non-tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 21 $65 $384
CT scan of chest, without contrast 20 $38 $226
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 17 $16 $87
Drainage of fluid collection of abdominal cavity by tube using imaging guidance 15 $137 $777
Insertion of tube into abdominal, pelvic, or leg artery, initial third order branch 14 $163 $1,798
Ultrasound of one leg arteries or artery grafts 14 $17 $94
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 13 $172 $1,367
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement 13 $23 $125
Drainage of fluid from chest cavity with insertion of indwelling tube using imaging guidance 12 $113 $597
Insertion of central venous tube with port (5 years or older) 12 $251 $1,334
Insertion of vena cava filter with review by radiologist 11 $151 $889
Ct scan of chest with contrast 11 $41 $240
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 11 $289 $1,783
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
1.1% high complexity
83.6% medium
15.4% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$7,357
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $1,051/year across 7 years
Top 9% in TX for radiation oncology
20
Companies
82
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$7,357 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$1,098
2023
$2,012
2022
$1,432
2021
$312
2020
$234
2019
$441
2018
$1,828

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Penumbra, Inc.
$1,932
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$1,517
Boston Scientific Corporation
$1,321
AngioDynamics, Inc.
$672
EKOS Corporation
$259
Cook Medical LLC
$231
Imperative Care, Inc
$229
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
$146
Biocompatibles, Inc.
$142
HeartFlow, Inc.
$134
ShockWave Medical, Inc
$129
Janssen Biotech, Inc.
$125
Shockwave Medical, Inc
$117
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$114
Ethicon US, LLC
$112
Galvanize Therapeutics, Inc
$102
Stryker Corporation
$22
Inari Medical, Inc.
$19
Sirtex Medical Inc
$19
Teleflex LLC
$15
Top 3 companies account for 64.8% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
103CM · ALIYA SYSTEM · ALPHAVAC · ARROW · Artis icono floor · CONQUEST · COOK MEDICAL CATHETERS · DARZALEX · EKOSONIC · EMBOLD Fibered · EMBOZENE · FFRct · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · FLUENCY · GENERAL THROMBECTOMY · GENERAL EMBOLICS · GENERAL METALLIC STENTS · GENERAL - VASCULAR INTERVENTION · GENERAL ULTRASOUND · GENERAL VASCULAR INTERVENTION · General - Vascular Intervention · Indigo System · LAVA LES (Liquid Embolic System) · NEUWAVE Flex Microwave Ablation System · Neff · RUBY Coil · S · SHOCKWAVE IVL SYSTEM WITH THE SHOCKWAVE C2 CORONARY IVL CATHETER · THERASPHERE · THERASPHERE - BIO · TheraSphere Y90 Glass Microspheres 10 GBq · ZENITH ALPHA · ZILVER PTX · ZOOM 88-T LARGE DISTAL PLATFORM · ZOOM RDL RADIAL ACCESS SYSTEM · ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians. Total industry engagement is in the top 9% for radiation oncology in TX.

Equivalent to $182 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in San Antonio?
Compare radiation oncologists in the San Antonio area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
245
Per 100K population
12.0
County median income
$70,571
Nearest hospital
UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Thomas is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 23% in TX), with low-engagement industry engagement in the top 9% of TX peers, with 20 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Thomas experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Thomas performed 3,050 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Thomas receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Thomas received a total of $7,357 from 20 companies across 82 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Thomas's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in San Antonio?
Dr. Thomas's average Medicare payment per service is $11. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Thomas) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →