Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Trevor Clayton, MD

Radiation Oncology · Mount Pleasant, TX
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice— Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
2001 N JEFFERSON AVE, Mount Pleasant, TX 75455
9035776000
In practice since 2007 (19 years)
NPI: 1780735845 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Clayton from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Clayton? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Clayton

Dr. Trevor Clayton is a radiation oncology in Mount Pleasant, TX, with 19 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Clayton performed 62,917 Medicare services across 7,005 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Clayton received a total of $291 from 3 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 11 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Clayton is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 19 years in practice▲ Top 1% volume in TX$ $291 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
62,917
Medicare services
Top 1% in TX for radiation oncology
7,005
Unique beneficiaries
$10
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~3,311 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)53,859$0$2
Injection, gadobenate dimeglumine (multihance), per ml2,327$1$8
3D screening mammography (tomosynthesis)903$51$116
Screening mammography902$125$286
Chest X-ray, 2 views569$17$49
CT scan of chest, without contrast545$91$734
Bone density scan (DEXA)527$37$325
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast199$139$1,352
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast191$263$900
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity191$74$290
Regadenoson injection (Lexiscan) for heart stress test188$42$76
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening178$136$350
Ct scan of chest with contrast177$89$764
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast151$243$2,050
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast133$229$796
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast104$135$750
Knee X-ray, 3 views98$21$72
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue80$75$250
Foot X-ray, 3+ views78$19$53
Mri scan of upper spinal canal without contrast71$123$1,360
Mri scan of leg joint without contrast69$138$1,341
Ct scan of abdominal aorta and both leg arteries with contrast66$214$1,592
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast65$76$710
Limited ultrasound scan of 1 breast65$58$183
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen60$55$225
Technetium tc-99m sestamibi, diagnostic, per study dose59$86$110
Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066)58$41$106
Mri scan of arm joint without contrast57$142$1,360
Nuclear medicine studies of heart muscle at rest and with stress and spect57$328$1,480
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view54$13$40
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views53$24$74
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views52$17$67
Diagnostic mammography of both breasts42$117$345
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views39$24$80
Ultrasound scan of abdominal aorta38$104$180
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views35$18$56
Mri scan of brain without contrast33$144$1,360
Technetium tc-99m medronate, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 30 millicuries32$30$38
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast31$185$1,075
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views30$18$72
Diagnostic mammography of 1 breast29$93$286
Ct scan of soft tissue of neck with contrast28$131$738
Nuclear medicine study of bone and/or joint whole body28$197$525
Ct scan of abdomen before and after contrast27$175$875
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views26$18$54
Fine needle aspiration biopsy using ultrasound guidance, first growth24$102$242
Ct scan of face without contrast21$85$710
X-ray of ribs on side of body, 2 views21$21$60
Ultrasound scan of scrotum21$64$235
Mri scan of middle spinal canal without contrast20$119$1,360
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast19$183$960
Biopsy of breast and placement of locating device using ultrasound, first growth18$392$1,292
Mri scan of pelvis without contrast17$170$1,200
Ct scan of cranial cavity without contrast16$113$684
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views15$20$66
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views14$16$49
X-ray of middle spine, 2 views13$17$58
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast12$83$738
Mri scan of leg without contrast12$163$950
X-ray of abdomen, 2 views12$15$38
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast12$307$940
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast12$239$1,904
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement12$45$375
X-ray of upper spine, 4-5 views11$24$80
Complete ultrasound scan of pelvis11$48$245
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2023 ↗
$291
Total received (2020-2023)
Avg $73/year across 4 years
Top 43% in TX for radiation oncology
3
Companies
11
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$291 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2023
$60
2022
$46
2021
$40
2020
$145

Payments by company (2023)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
$228
Astellas Pharma US Inc
$49
GE HealthCare
$14
Top 3 companies account for 100.0% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
LEXISCAN · Lexiscan
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $0 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology in Mount Pleasant?
Compare radiation oncologys in the Mount Pleasant area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologys nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation Oncologys within 10 mi
4
Per 100K population
12.8
County median income
$59,220
Nearest hospital
TITUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2023
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Clayton is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 1% in TX), and low-engagement industry engagement, with 19 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Clayton experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Clayton performed 53,859 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Clayton receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Clayton received a total of $291 from 3 companies across 11 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Clayton's costs compare to other radiation oncologys in Mount Pleasant?
Dr. Clayton's average Medicare payment per service is $10. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Clayton) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →