Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Andrew Farach, MD

Radiology - Diagnostic · Houston, TX
Practice pattern: Clinical Cardiology— Primarily office-based clinical cardiology
Speaking/Promotional
6565 FANNIN ST # DB1-077, Houston, TX 77030
7134414800
In practice since 2015 (10 years)
NPI: 1356720841 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Farach from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Farach? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Farach

Dr. Andrew Farach is a radiology - diagnostic in Houston, TX, with 10 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Farach performed 2,827 Medicare services across 1,130 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Farach received a total of $24,151 from 18 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 70 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiology - diagnostic. The majority of payments are for speaking programs and promotional activities, reflecting participation in industry-sponsored events. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Farach is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 10 years in practice▲ Top 32% volume in TX$ $24,151 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
2,827
Medicare services
Top 32% in TX for radiology - diagnostic
1,130
Unique beneficiaries
$88
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~283 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
CT guidance for radiation therapy1,029$35$165
Calculation of radiation therapy dose425$26$172
Radiation treatment management, 5 treatment sessions234$153$1,000
Design and construction of complex radiation treatment device141$48$321
Design and construction of radiation treatment device for high precision radiation therapy122$179$1,187
High precision radiation therapy planning119$328$2,210
Complex radiation therapy planning85$128$844
Special radiation treatment82$83$566
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min)67$50$151
New patient office visit, complex (60-74 min)59$140$492
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)49$77$230
Obtaining respiratory data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment45$81$558
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement34$25$122
Management of cranial lesion surgery using radiation over multiple sessions33$501$3,376
Obtaining data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment, 1 treatment area30$31$197
High dose radiation therapy, more than 12 channels29$228$1,486
Insertion of needle or tube into prostate for radiation therapy28$629$4,015
High dose radiation therapy, 2-12 channels26$160$1,051
Placement of device in prostate for radiation therapy24$39$580
3d radiation therapy planning24$179$1,187
Office visit, established patient, complex (40-54 min)24$115$323
Obtaining data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment, 3 or more treatment areas or any number of treatment areas where special treatment is involved23$61$435
Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy23$17$107
High dose radiation therapy, 1 channel19$80$542
Injection of biodegradable material next to prostate18$73$875
Design and construction of simple radiation treatment device18$19$125
Initial hospital admission, moderate complexity17$105$401
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
1.2% high complexity
90.0% medium
8.8% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$24,151
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $3,450/year across 7 years
Top 7% in TX for radiology - diagnostic
18
Companies
70
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$21,943 (90.9%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$1,758 (7.3%)
Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$450 (1.9%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$10,015
2023
$7,234
2022
$3,918
2021
$15
2020
$14
2019
$2,448
2018
$507

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$19,673
IsoRay, Inc
$3,018
Boston Scientific Corporation
$366
BIOPROTECT MEDICAL, INC.
$297
Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
$124
Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.
$123
VisionRT, Inc.
$119
Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC
$101
Shionogi Inc
$84
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$63
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
$40
Myovant Sciences Inc.
$37
Allergan Inc.
$22
Shire North American Group Inc
$20
EISAI INC.
$18
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
$17
FUJIFILM Wako Diagnostics U.S.A. Corporation
$16
Eisai Inc.
$14
Top 3 companies account for 95.5% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANT SYSTEM · BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE · Brachytherapy Source · Bravos Afterloader System · DIFICID · GATTEX · IORT · LIBTAYO · Lenvima · Mulpleta · Nexavar · ORGOVYX · RELISTOR · STRATTICE · SpaceOAR VUE System - 10mL · TrueBeam · Wako HCC Biomarker(s) DCP and AFP-L3 · XIFAXAN
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (91%) are for speaking programs and promotional activities, which reflect participation in industry-sponsored educational or marketing events. This is common in radiology - diagnostic and does not inherently indicate bias, but patients may wish to be aware. Total industry engagement is in the top 7% for radiology - diagnostic in TX.

Equivalent to $854 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiology - diagnostic in Houston?
Compare radiology - diagnostics in the Houston area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiology - diagnostics nearby

Geographic Context

Radiology - Diagnostics within 10 mi
141
Per 100K population
3.0
County median income
$73,104
Nearest hospital
MEMORIAL HERMANN - TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2024
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Farach is a clinical cardiology specialist, with moderate Medicare volume, and high industry engagement (speaking/promotional, top 7%).

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Farach experienced with ct guidance for radiation therapy?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Farach performed 1,029 ct guidance for radiation therapy services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Farach receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Farach received a total of $24,151 from 18 companies across 70 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Farach's costs compare to other radiology - diagnostics in Houston?
Dr. Farach's average Medicare payment per service is $88. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Farach) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →