Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Peter Mena, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · Dallas, TX
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
5323 HARRY HINES BLVD, Dallas, TX 75390
2146457237
In practice since 2015 (10 years)
NPI: 1427444280 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Mena from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Mena? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Mena

Dr. Peter Mena is a radiation oncology specialist in Dallas, TX, with 10 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Mena performed 6,677 Medicare services across 5,103 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Mena received a total of $1,588 from 10 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 27 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Mena is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 10 years in practice ▲ Top 12% volume in TX $1,588 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
6,677
Medicare services
Top 12% in TX for radiation oncology
5,103
Unique beneficiaries
$25
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~668 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 1,175 $0 $1
Chest X-ray, 1 view 1,104 $7 $28
Chest X-ray, 2 views 588 $8 $32
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 423 $32 $159
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 244 $67 $349
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 224 $69 $336
CT scan of chest, without contrast 202 $40 $179
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 136 $7 $27
Use of a drug to induce depression of consciousness by physician performing a procedure (5 years or older), initial 15 minutes 114 $10 $39
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 113 $69 $253
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 100 $9 $33
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 92 $38 $209
Mri scan of brain without contrast 90 $57 $215
Limited ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 89 $21 $86
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 74 $23 $93
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 73 $17 $66
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 72 $26 $103
Ultrasonic guidance for blood vessel access 70 $12 $46
Knee X-ray, 3 views 69 $7 $31
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 61 $7 $31
Fluoroscopic guidance for insertion or removal of central vein access device 58 $15 $60
Review by radiologist of ct guidance for needle placement 57 $58 $173
Ct scan of chest with contrast 55 $44 $217
Drainage of fluid from abdominal cavity using imaging guidance 54 $87 $299
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 53 $7 $33
X-ray of abdomen, 2 views 53 $8 $36
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast 50 $66 $291
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow 50 $31 $118
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast 47 $70 $289
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views 45 $10 $51
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 42 $6 $31
Insertion of tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 41 $212 $894
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 39 $29 $136
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 38 $85 $285
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 36 $6 $31
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 36 $7 $29
Nuclear medicine studies of heart muscle at rest and with stress and spect 35 $56 $239
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue 34 $22 $83
Biopsy and aspiration of bone marrow sample for diagnosis 32 $63 $233
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 31 $7 $28
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views 31 $6 $28
Aspiration of fluid from chest cavity using imaging guidance 29 $87 $323
Fine needle aspiration biopsy using ultrasound guidance, first growth 28 $58 $222
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 27 $8 $33
Limited ultrasound scan of pelvis 27 $17 $74
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement 25 $25 $104
Ct scan of face without contrast 24 $30 $184
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views 24 $7 $31
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast 23 $76 $317
X-ray of middle spine, 2 views 22 $7 $33
Insertion of tube for infusion with imaging guidance and review by radiologist, patient 5 years or older 20 $62 $300
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast 20 $87 $317
Single contrast x-ray of esophagus 20 $23 $68
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen 20 $29 $132
X-ray of hip, 1 view 19 $8 $28
Core needle biopsy of lung or center cavity of chest (mediastinum), accessed through skin 18 $125 $498
X-ray of upper spine, 4-5 views 18 $11 $47
Mri scan of blood vessels of head without contrast 17 $46 $185
Ct scan of leg without contrast 17 $38 $168
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast 16 $91 $333
X-ray of ribs on side of body, minimum of 3 views 16 $11 $50
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 16 $7 $28
Nuclear medicine study of lung circulation 16 $25 $102
Computed tomography (ct) of brain blood flow, volume, and timing of flow analysis with contrast 15 $199 $1,000
X-ray of upper arm, minimum of 2 views 15 $7 $25
Nuclear medicine study of liver and bile duct system 15 $23 $101
Insertion of central venous tube with port (5 years or older) 14 $277 $1,160
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast 14 $58 $216
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 14 $9 $33
Ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis artery and vein blood flow 14 $27 $137
Removal of tunneled central venous tube 13 $107 $503
X-ray of ribs on side of body, 2 views 13 $8 $34
X-ray of forearm, 2 views 12 $6 $27
Imaging for evaluation of swallowing function 12 $20 $81
Nuclear medicine study of lung ventilation and circulation 12 $41 $155
Mri scan of blood vessels of neck without contrast 11 $33 $178
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast 11 $43 $203
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
0.9% high complexity
54.7% medium
44.4% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$1,588
Total received (2021-2024)
Avg $397/year across 4 years
Top 23% in TX for radiation oncology
10
Companies
27
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$1,588 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$492
2023
$597
2022
$92
2021
$406

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Inari Medical, Inc.
$697
ARGON MEDICAL DEVICES, INC.
$380
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$228
Sirtex Medical Inc
$161
AngioDynamics, Inc.
$34
Penumbra, Inc.
$25
Stryker Corporation
$17
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
$16
Terumo Medical Corporation
$16
Boston Scientific Corporation
$15
Top 3 companies account for 82.1% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ACQUIRE · ALPHAVAC · AlphaVac · Clot Management · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · Indigo System · Option · S · SIR-Spheres Microspheres · SPINEJACK · SPYGLASS · SpyGlass · TR BAND · Trek
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $24 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Dallas?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Dallas area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
624
Per 100K population
24.0
County median income
$74,149
Nearest hospital
UT OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS JR.
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Mena is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 12% in TX), with low-engagement industry engagement.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Mena experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Mena performed 1,175 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Mena receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Mena received a total of $1,588 from 10 companies across 27 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Mena's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Dallas?
Dr. Mena's average Medicare payment per service is $25. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Mena) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →