Medicare Enrolled

Dr. John Miller, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · Beaumont, TX
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
3560 DELAWARE ST, Beaumont, TX 77706
4098993682
In practice since 2005 (20 years)
NPI: 1467457796 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Miller from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Miller? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Miller

Dr. John Miller is a radiation oncology specialist in Beaumont, TX, with 20 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Miller performed 4,308 Medicare services across 3,945 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Miller received a total of $279 from 7 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 9 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Miller is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice ▲ Top 21% volume in TX $279 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
4,308
Medicare services
Top 21% in TX for radiation oncology
3,945
Unique beneficiaries
$21
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~215 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Chest X-ray, 1 view 1,899 $7 $59
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 284 $68 $749
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 276 $7 $49
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 182 $70 $594
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue 105 $22 $191
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 89 $29 $252
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 70 $7 $60
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 59 $9 $72
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast 58 $84 $566
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 57 $23 $202
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen 50 $31 $278
Chest X-ray, 2 views 47 $8 $72
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 47 $7 $61
Imaging for evaluation of swallowing function 46 $21 $180
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast 45 $41 $372
CT scan of chest, without contrast 42 $41 $387
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 42 $85 $795
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 39 $7 $60
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 37 $7 $60
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 33 $7 $62
Double contrast x-ray of esophagus 32 $27 $206
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 31 $7 $60
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening 30 $53 $383
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow 30 $31 $213
Knee X-ray, 3 views 29 $7 $68
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views 28 $7 $62
Dxa bone density measurement of forearm, finger, hand, or foot 27 $10 $76
X-ray of upper arm, minimum of 2 views 26 $7 $59
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views 26 $6 $59
X-ray of ribs on side of body, minimum of 3 views 25 $10 $93
Nuclear medicine study of lung circulation 24 $29 $248
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 24 $26 $242
Ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis artery and vein blood flow 24 $31 $374
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 23 $9 $80
X-ray of forearm, 2 views 22 $6 $55
Complete ultrasound scan of pelvis 21 $27 $237
Bone density scan (DEXA) 20 $10 $74
Double contrast x-ray of upper digestive tract 19 $35 $240
3d radiographic procedure 19 $8 $68
Ultrasound scan of scrotum 19 $25 $217
Limited ultrasound scan of joint or other extremity structure except blood vessels 19 $27 $121
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 19 $17 $157
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views 18 $7 $59
Ct scan of leg without contrast 17 $38 $370
Single contrast x-ray of esophagus 17 $24 $158
Single contrast x-ray of upper digestive tract 17 $32 $236
Ultrasound scan of uterus, ovaries, tubes, cervix and pelvic area through vagina 17 $27 $237
Ct scan of chest with contrast 16 $43 $411
Mri scan of pelvis before and after contrast 15 $86 $567
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 15 $7 $60
Mri scan of abdomen without contrast 15 $55 $383
Single contrast x-ray of small intestine 15 $32 $162
Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement 15 $22 $184
Complete ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis artery and vein blood flow 15 $45 $565
Joint injection, major joint 14 $36 $320
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 13 $71 $786
Follow-through x-ray of small intestines 12 $27 $206
X-ray series of abdomen with single x-ray of chest 11 $11 $105
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast 11 $78 $850
Ultrasound of leg arteries or artery grafts 11 $28 $210
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$279
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $70/year across 4 years
Top 44% in TX for radiation oncology
7
Companies
9
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$279 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$53
2023
$114
2020
$14
2018
$99

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Biogen, Inc.
$98
Boston Scientific Corporation
$67
Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC
$43
Stryker Corporation
$23
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$22
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
$16
EKOS Corporation
$11
Top 3 companies account for 74.3% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
COMET · Contour · EKOSONIC · GENERAL TACHY · PROLENSA · Spinraza · TREVO · clonoSEQ
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $6 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Beaumont?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Beaumont area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
20
Per 100K population
7.9
County median income
$59,934
Nearest hospital
CHRISTUS SOUTHEAST TEXAS- ST ELIZABETH
2.5 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Miller is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 21% in TX), with low-engagement industry engagement, with 20 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Miller experienced with chest x-ray, 1 view?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Miller performed 1,899 chest x-ray, 1 view services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Miller receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Miller received a total of $279 from 7 companies across 9 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Miller's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Beaumont?
Dr. Miller's average Medicare payment per service is $21. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Miller) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →