Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Markus Scherer, MD

Internal Medicine · Charlotte, NC
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Consulting-driven
1237 HARDING PL, Charlotte, NC 28204
7043730212
In practice since 2005 (21 years)
NPI: 1699771790 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Scherer from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Scherer? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Scherer

Dr. Markus Scherer is an internal medicine specialist in Charlotte, NC, with 21 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Scherer performed 5,224 Medicare services across 607 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Scherer received a total of $428,828 from 14 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 680 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in internal medicine. The majority of payments are for consulting, which typically reflects recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Scherer is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 21 years in practice ▲ Top 7% volume in NC $428,828 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
5,224
Medicare services
Top 7% in NC for internal medicine
607
Unique beneficiaries
$7
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · How to read this →
~249 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)
A contrast agent containing 300-399 mg/ml of iodine used to enhance imaging studies. It is administered per milliliter to improve the visibility of internal structures.
4,649 $0 $1
Echocardiogram, transthoracic
An ultrasound of the heart that uses color to show blood flow, rate, direction, and valve function.
103 $115 $677
Echocardiogram with color Doppler
An ultrasound of the heart that uses color imaging to visualize blood flow, measure flow rate, and assess valve function.
59 $2 $16
Transesophageal echocardiogram
An ultrasound of the heart performed using a probe inserted into the esophagus to obtain detailed images of heart structures and function.
55 $83 $443
Echocardiogram, transthoracic
An ultrasound test that uses sound waves to create images of the heart's blood flow, valves, and chambers.
55 $14 $75
Follow-up heart ultrasound
An ultrasound of the heart performed to monitor or reassess a previously identified condition or treatment progress.
47 $19 $105
Follow-up ultrasound of heart blood flow, valves and chambers
An ultrasound exam that follows up on the heart's blood flow, valves, and chambers. It uses sound waves to create images of the heart's structure and function.
43 $5 $26
CT scan of heart blood vessels and grafts with contrast
A CT scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed images of the heart's blood vessels and any surgical grafts.
25 $196 $1,216
Transesophageal echocardiogram during heart surgery
An ultrasound of the heart performed using a probe inserted into the esophagus while surgery on the heart or major blood vessels is taking place, including a written report.
25 $173 $797
Perflutren lipid microspheres injection
Injection of perflutren lipid microspheres, measured per milliliter.
24 $36 $249
Blood creatinine level test
A blood test that measures the amount of creatinine, a waste product from muscle wear and tear, to help assess kidney function.
22 $5 $25
Sedation by physician, initial 15 minutes
Administration of a drug to induce depression of consciousness by the physician performing a procedure. This code covers the initial 15 minutes of sedation for patients aged 5 years or older.
22 $10 $171
Heart muscle strain imaging 21 $27 $156
CT scan of heart with contrast
A computed tomography scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed images of the heart's structure.
17 $173 $798
3D radiographic procedure
A radiographic imaging technique that creates three-dimensional representations of internal structures.
15 $18 $380
CT scan of chest blood vessels with contrast
A CT scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed images of the blood vessels in the chest.
14 $90 $1,651
Exercise or drug-induced heart stress test with ECG
A heart stress test performed using exercise or medication while an electrocardiogram is monitored under physician supervision.
14 $16 $77
Exercise or drug-induced heart stress test with ECG
A test that monitors the heart's electrical activity while the patient exercises or receives medication to increase heart rate.
14 $20 $230
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
4.3% high complexity
94.5% medium
1.1% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$428,828
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $61,261/year across 7 years
Top 0% in NC for internal medicine
A higher payment rank reflects disclosed industry relationships (consulting, research, speaking) common among subspecialists — not wrongdoing.
14
Companies
680
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$289,531 (67.5%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$128,331 (29.9%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$10,965 (2.6%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$136,737
2023
$62,758
2022
$41,904
2021
$47,775
2020
$36,823
2019
$85,434
2018
$17,396

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Philips North America LLC
$57,694
Abbott Laboratories
$50,397
Boston Scientific Corporation
$23,687
HEARTFLOW, INC.
$3,549
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$1,169
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$162
GE HEALTHCARE
$67
Medtronic, Inc.
$13
Top 3 companies account for 96.4% of 2024 payments
All-time payments by company (2018-2024) ›
Abbott Laboratories
$197,028
Boston Scientific Corporation
$74,830
Philips North America LLC
$57,694
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$52,987
HeartFlow, Inc.
$24,310
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$10,463
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$6,657
HEARTFLOW, INC.
$3,549
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
$858
GE HEALTHCARE
$128
Vital Images, Inc.
$116
ABIOMED
$107
ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp)
$88
Medtronic, Inc.
$13
Top 3 companies account for 76.8% of all-time payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
(1658) Educ Ultrasound · (9148) ICE 3D · (9520) IGT Devices Und · (9520) IGT Devices Undivided · (9525) Intracardiac Und · (AO0) IGT Devices Intracardiac · (BS3) Intracardiac Und · ACUSON Origin Diagnostic Ultrasound System · ACUSON SC2000 Diagnostic Ultrasound System · ACUSON Sequoia Diagnostic Ultrasound System · ADVANCED VISUALIZATION · AMPLATZER · AMPLATZER AMULET · AMPLATZER Occluders · AVEIR · Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve · COREVALVE EVOLUT R · EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE (THV) · Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve · Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve · FFRct · FreeStyle Libre blood glucose Flash Monitoring System · GENERAL THERAPIES · GENERAL VASCULAR ACCESS · GENERAL VASCULAR ACCESS · General - Vascular Access · Impella · LifeVest · MITRACLIP · Mitra Clip system · MitraClip System · NAEOTOM Alpha · PASCAL · SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA · SOMATOM Force · Tricuspid Valve Repair System · WATCHMAN · WATCHMAN Access System · WATCHMAN FLX · syngo Dynamics
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (68%) are consulting fees, which typically reflect recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Total industry engagement is in the top 0% for internal medicine in NC.

Looking for an internal medicine specialist in Charlotte?
Compare internal medicine physicians in the Charlotte area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse internal medicine physicians nearby

Geographic Context

Internal medicine physicians within 10 mi
1,071
Per 100K population
94.7
County median income
$83,765
Nearest hospital
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER/BEHAV HEALTH
1.8 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This reflects how much public data is available about a provider. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Scherer is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 7% in NC), with consulting-driven industry engagement in the top 0% of NC peers, with 21 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data, describing data availability and patterns. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Scherer experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Scherer performed 4,649 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Scherer receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Scherer received a total of $428,828 from 14 companies across 680 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Scherer's costs compare to other internal medicine physicians in Charlotte?
Dr. Scherer's average Medicare payment per service is $7. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Scherer) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. Data Coverage reflects data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →