Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Leo Spector, MD

Orthopedic Surgery · Charlotte, NC
Practice pattern: Clinical Cardiology — Primarily office-based clinical cardiology
Consulting-driven
2001 RANDOLPH RD, Charlotte, NC 28207
7043322000
In practice since 2006 (20 years)
NPI: 1639100506 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Spector from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Spector? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Spector

Dr. Leo Spector is an orthopedic surgery specialist in Charlotte, NC, with 20 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Spector performed 1,188 Medicare services across 1,033 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Spector received a total of $112,966 from 21 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 196 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in orthopedic surgery. The majority of payments are for consulting, which typically reflects recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Spector is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice ▲ Top 46% volume in NC $112,966 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
1,188
Medicare services
Top 46% in NC for orthopedic surgery
1,033
Unique beneficiaries
$121
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · How to read this →
~59 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)
A follow-up office visit for an existing patient lasting between 30 and 39 minutes. The visit involves medical evaluation and management of the patient's condition.
314 $88 $237
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min)
An office visit for an existing patient lasting between 20 and 29 minutes. The visit involves medical evaluation and management of the patient's condition.
147 $64 $151
MRI of lower spine, without contrast
A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the lower spinal canal that does not use contrast dye to create detailed images of the spine.
146 $88 $1,346
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views
An X-ray imaging test that captures 2 to 3 views of the lower back and sacral spine to visualize the bones and joints in this area.
143 $28 $106
Spine fusion with cage or mesh device insertion
A surgical procedure to fuse spine bones by inserting a cage or mesh device into the disc space.
68 $150 $713
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views with bending
An X-ray imaging test of the lower back and sacrum using 2 to 3 views, including bending positions.
57 $28 $131
X-ray of upper spine, 2-3 views
An X-ray imaging test of the upper spine using two to three different angles to visualize the bones and structures.
50 $29 $98
New patient office visit (45-59 min)
An initial office visit for a new patient lasting between 45 and 59 minutes. This code covers the total time spent by the physician or qualified healthcare professional on the date of the encounter.
44 $113 $390
MRI of upper spine without contrast
An MRI scan of the upper spinal canal that does not use contrast dye. This imaging test uses magnetic fields and radio waves to create detailed pictures of the spine.
39 $67 $1,213
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with partial disc removal
A surgical procedure to fuse the lower spine bones by accessing the area through the abdomen and partially removing a spinal disc.
36 $623 $3,393
Partial removal of spine bone with nerve release, each additional segment
This procedure involves the partial removal of spinal bone to relieve pressure on the spinal cord or nerves. It is billed for each additional spinal segment treated beyond the initial segment.
29 $150 $604
Partial removal of spine bone with nerve release, 1 segment
A surgical procedure involving the partial removal of a bone segment in the spine to relieve pressure on the spinal cord or nerves. This is performed on a single spinal segment.
28 $704 $3,071
Spinal stabilization device placement, 3-6 segments
Surgical placement of a device to stabilize three to six vertebrae in the back.
22 $468 $2,014
Placement of stabilizing device to back of 1 spine bone in neck
A procedure involving the placement of a stabilizing device on the back of a single vertebra in the neck.
19 $396 $1,793
MRI of pelvis, without contrast
A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the pelvic area performed without the use of contrast dye.
16 $120 $1,203
MRI of middle spinal canal, without contrast
This procedure uses magnetic resonance imaging to create detailed pictures of the middle section of the spinal canal. It is performed without the use of contrast dye.
15 $63 $1,346
MRI of lower spine with and without contrast
An MRI scan of the lower spinal canal performed both before and after the administration of contrast dye to enhance image detail.
15 $153 $2,696
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
8.8% high complexity
19.4% medium
71.8% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$112,966
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $16,138/year across 7 years
Top 7% in NC for orthopedic surgery
A higher payment rank reflects disclosed industry relationships (consulting, research, speaking) common among subspecialists — not wrongdoing.
21
Companies
196
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$64,762 (57.3%)
Financial / Ownership
Ownership or investment interests, royalties, and licensing fees
$25,587 (22.7%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$19,889 (17.6%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$2,728 (2.4%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$9,497
2023
$28,039
2022
$24,051
2021
$16,933
2020
$3,908
2019
$21,462
2018
$9,077

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Peerless Surgical Inc.
$3,782
Cerapedics Inc.
$3,000
Spine Wave, Inc.
$2,271
Medtronic, Inc.
$300
Globus Medical, Inc.
$120
Arthrex, Inc.
$24
Top 3 companies account for 95.3% of 2024 payments
All-time payments by company (2018-2024) ›
NuVasive, Inc.
$43,498
Cutting Edge Spine, LLC
$25,587
Stryker Corporation
$10,404
Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
$9,360
Cerapedics Inc.
$6,536
Synthes GmbH
$4,891
Spine Wave, Inc.
$4,637
Peerless Surgical Inc.
$3,782
Globus Medical, Inc.
$1,466
Medtronic, Inc.
$1,319
Ethicon Inc.
$585
DePuy Synthes Sales Inc.
$351
K2M, Inc.
$181
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$156
Medtronic USA, Inc.
$59
Orthofix Medical, Inc.
$45
Cerapedics, Inc.
$29
Nevro Corp.
$28
Arthrex, Inc.
$24
Choice Spine, LLC
$14
Zyla Life Sciences
$13
Top 3 companies account for 70.4% of all-time payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ADVANCED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · ALIF · ANATOMIC PEEK PTC CERVICAL FUSION SYSTEM · ANTERALIGN SPINAL SYSTEM WITH TITAN NANOLOCK SURFACE TECHNOLOGY · AttraX · Blackhawk · CATALYFT PL EXPANDABLE INTERBODY SYSTEM · CD HORIZON · CONDUIT · Excelsius3D Imaging System · ExcelsiusGPS Robotic Navigation System · General K2M Product Discussion · I-FACTOR PEPTIDE ENHANCED BONE GRAFT · INFINITY OCCIPITOCERVICAL UPPER THORACIC SYSTEM · INFINITY OCT System · M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc · MAKO · MAZOR X SYSTEM · MOUNTAINEER · Modulus · NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT · Orbit-R Anterior Lumbar Disc · PRESTIGE · Preserve TLIF · Pulse · RELINE · SALVO SPINE SYSTEM · SOVEREIGN SPINAL SYSTEM · SPRIX · SYNAPSE · Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System · Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc · TLIF · TRITANIUM · UNID_PASS · ViviGen · VuePoint · XLIF
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (57%) are consulting fees, which typically reflect recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Total industry engagement is in the top 7% for orthopedic surgery in NC.

Looking for an orthopedic surgery specialist in Charlotte?
Compare orthopedic surgeons in the Charlotte area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse orthopedic surgeons nearby

Geographic Context

Orthopedic surgeons within 10 mi
202
Per 100K population
17.9
County median income
$83,765
Nearest hospital
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER/BEHAV HEALTH
2.1 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This reflects how much public data is available about a provider. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Spector is a clinical cardiology specialist, with moderate Medicare volume, with consulting-driven industry engagement in the top 7% of NC peers, with 20 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data, describing data availability and patterns. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Spector experienced with office visit, established patient (30-39 min)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Spector performed 314 office visit, established patient (30-39 min) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Spector receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Spector received a total of $112,966 from 21 companies across 196 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Spector's costs compare to other orthopedic surgeons in Charlotte?
Dr. Spector's average Medicare payment per service is $121. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Spector) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. Data Coverage reflects data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →