Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Paul Swartz, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · Tampa, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice— Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
4516 N ARMENIA AVE, Tampa, FL 33603
8133486900
In practice since 2007 (18 years)
NPI: 1982828752 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Swartz from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Swartz? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Swartz

Dr. Paul Swartz is a radiation oncology in Tampa, FL, with 18 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Swartz performed 11,022 Medicare services across 3,036 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Swartz received a total of $995 from 6 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 11 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Swartz is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 18 years in practice▲ Top 19% volume in FL$ $995 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
11,022
Medicare services
Top 19% in FL for radiation oncology
3,036
Unique beneficiaries
$9
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~612 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
MRI contrast dye injection (gadobutrol)6,217$0$1
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)1,692$0$3
Chest X-ray, 1 view870$7$37
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast420$31$196
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast184$66$427
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view117$7$37
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast115$64$419
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast84$241$1,610
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast82$36$224
3d radiographic procedure80$8$40
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast63$69$395
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers61$26$203
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity54$27$152
Mri scan of brain without contrast53$54$303
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views47$7$40
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views45$7$39
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen45$22$118
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views43$7$43
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow42$30$177
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers41$17$131
Nuclear medicine studies of heart muscle at rest and with stress and spect37$61$320
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast36$34$285
Ct scan of chest with contrast33$40$256
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views30$8$46
Ct scan of leg without contrast30$36$209
Foot X-ray, 3+ views29$6$35
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views27$9$50
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast26$62$479
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast24$65$477
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views22$6$36
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views22$6$35
Chest X-ray, 2 views21$26$83
Mri scan of upper spinal canal without contrast21$56$307
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast21$83$451
Ct scan of face without contrast20$32$233
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views20$7$36
CT scan of chest, without contrast19$99$626
X-ray of upper arm, minimum of 2 views19$7$36
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast18$39$222
Mri scan of abdomen without contrast18$56$299
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views17$6$36
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views16$9$50
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast16$55$309
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast15$83$471
Dilation of stomach and/or small bowel using long gastrointestinal tube14$16$103
Review by radiologist of placement of long small bowel tube14$21$113
X-ray of abdomen, 2 views13$9$47
Computed tomography (ct) of brain blood flow, volume, and timing of flow analysis with contrast12$178$506
Mri scan of middle spinal canal without contrast12$55$425
X-ray of forearm, 2 views12$6$35
X-ray of upper spine, 4-5 views11$41$128
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views11$39$132
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views11$6$40
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$995
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $249/year across 4 years
Top 26% in FL for radiation oncology
6
Companies
11
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$995 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$296
2022
$144
2019
$232
2018
$324

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Penumbra, Inc.
$351
MicroVention, Inc.
$217
Sirtex Medical Inc
$205
Inari Medical, Inc.
$162
Imperative Care, Inc
$33
Stryker Corporation
$28
Top 3 companies account for 77.7% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ACE · BALLOON CATHETER · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · Penumbra SMART Coil · Real Immersive System · S · SIR-Spheres Microspheres · STENT · TARGET · WEB · ZOOM 88-T LARGE DISTAL PLATFORM
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $9 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology in Tampa?
Compare radiation oncologys in the Tampa area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologys nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation Oncologys within 10 mi
385
Per 100K population
25.8
County median income
$75,011
Nearest hospital
AdventHealth Carrollwood
2.9 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2024
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Swartz is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 19% in FL), and low-engagement industry engagement, with 18 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Swartz experienced with mri contrast dye injection (gadobutrol)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Swartz performed 6,217 mri contrast dye injection (gadobutrol) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Swartz receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Swartz received a total of $995 from 6 companies across 11 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Swartz's costs compare to other radiation oncologys in Tampa?
Dr. Swartz's average Medicare payment per service is $9. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Swartz) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →