Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Patrick Redmond, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · St Petersburg, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
1200 7TH AVE N, St Petersburg, FL 33705
7278251100
In practice since 2010 (15 years)
NPI: 1073824447 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Redmond from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Redmond? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Redmond

Dr. Patrick Redmond is a radiation oncology specialist in St Petersburg, FL, with 15 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Redmond performed 7,998 Medicare services across 1,570 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Redmond received a total of $3,015 from 14 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 46 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Redmond is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 15 years in practice ▲ Top 24% volume in FL $3,015 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
7,998
Medicare services
Top 24% in FL for radiation oncology
1,570
Unique beneficiaries
$11
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~533 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 5,737 $0 $3
MRI contrast dye injection (gadobutrol) 603 $0 $1
Chest X-ray, 1 view 220 $7 $25
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 109 $31 $121
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 107 $25 $90
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 96 $73 $316
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen 75 $74 $331
Knee X-ray, 3 views 70 $25 $101
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 67 $25 $85
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 56 $32 $116
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 49 $22 $85
Mri scan of leg joint without contrast 45 $148 $1,037
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 44 $27 $114
Ultrasonic guidance for blood vessel access 42 $12 $45
Use of a drug to induce depression of consciousness by physician performing a procedure (5 years or older), initial 15 minutes 42 $10 $38
Fluoroscopic guidance for insertion or removal of central vein access device 40 $15 $52
Mri scan of arm joint without contrast 39 $135 $1,040
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 38 $63 $252
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening 37 $135 $338
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 28 $233 $1,202
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast 28 $255 $1,458
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 28 $24 $110
Limited ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 27 $21 $84
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 26 $26 $91
Ct scan of leg without contrast 23 $89 $600
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 22 $20 $75
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 21 $63 $273
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 20 $37 $164
Insertion of non-tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 19 $69 $375
CT scan of chest, without contrast 19 $94 $626
X-ray of joint between lower spine and hip bone, 3 or more views 19 $29 $97
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 19 $136 $906
X-ray of both hips, minimum of 5 views 17 $39 $151
Chest X-ray, 2 views 15 $25 $83
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 15 $84 $322
Ct scan of chest with contrast 14 $88 $820
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 14 $31 $96
Insertion of tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 13 $211 $808
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 13 $7 $29
Complete ultrasound scan of pelvis 13 $43 $294
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 13 $17 $68
Ultrasound of leg arteries or artery grafts 12 $183 $635
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views 11 $25 $132
Ct scan of arm without contrast 11 $116 $599
X-ray of both knees while standing 11 $31 $100
Ultrasound scan of abdominal aorta 11 $102 $285
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
0.4% high complexity
88.5% medium
11.1% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$3,015
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $431/year across 7 years
Top 17% in FL for radiation oncology
14
Companies
46
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$3,015 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$270
2023
$482
2022
$1,253
2021
$527
2020
$140
2019
$232
2018
$110

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Inari Medical, Inc.
$1,259
Penumbra, Inc.
$386
Boston Scientific Corporation
$324
Medtronic, Inc.
$319
Ethicon US, LLC
$181
ARGON MEDICAL DEVICES, INC.
$147
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$143
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
$69
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
$50
AngioDynamics, Inc.
$39
Abbott Laboratories
$34
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$32
Teleflex LLC
$16
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
$16
Top 3 companies account for 65.3% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ALPHAVAC · AMPLATZER Occluders · ANGIOJET · Artis Q floor · CERTUS 140 MICROWAVE ABLATION SYSTEM · Certus 140 · ELUVIA · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · FlowTriever · GENERAL - EMBOLICS · Indigo System · JETI PERIPHERAL CATHETER · KYPHON EXPRESS II KYPHOPAK TRAY · OPTION · RUBY Coil · Radial Access - VascBand · S · SMART PORT CT · Syfovre · TRINAV INFUSION SYSTEM · TheraSphere Y90 Glass Microspheres 10 GBq
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $38 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in St Petersburg?
Compare radiation oncologists in the St Petersburg area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
330
Per 100K population
34.4
County median income
$70,293
Nearest hospital
ST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Redmond is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 24% in FL), with low-engagement industry engagement in the top 17% of FL peers, with 15 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Redmond experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Redmond performed 5,737 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Redmond receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Redmond received a total of $3,015 from 14 companies across 46 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Redmond's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in St Petersburg?
Dr. Redmond's average Medicare payment per service is $11. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Redmond) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →