Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Michael Poiesz, M.D.

Hematology & Oncology · Pensacola, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice— Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
4724 N DAVIS HWY, Pensacola, FL 32503
8506964000
In practice since 2007 (18 years)
NPI: 1952528762 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Poiesz from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Poiesz? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Poiesz

Dr. Michael Poiesz is a hematology & oncology in Pensacola, FL, with 18 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Poiesz performed 115,071 Medicare services across 2,290 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Poiesz received a total of $3,296 from 45 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 170 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in hematology & oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Poiesz is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 18 years in practice▲ Top 6% volume in FL$ $3,296 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
115,071
Medicare services
Top 6% in FL for hematology & oncology
2,290
Unique beneficiaries
$12
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~6,393 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
Filgrastim injection (Nivestym) for white blood cells30,180$0$2
Pembrolizumab injection (Keytruda)19,400$43$131
Iron infusion (Feraheme)16,320$0$6
Paclitaxel chemotherapy injection9,138$0$1
Darbepoetin injection (Aranesp) for anemia9,050$2$21
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)5,600$0$3
Anti-nausea injection (aprepitant)5,070$1$8
Anti-nausea injection (fosaprepitant)4,200$0$6
Iron infusion (Monoferric)3,600$16$71
Denosumab injection (Prolia/Xgeva)2,280$18$46
Immune globulin infusion (Octagam)1,800$34$221
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)1,302$93$224
Dexamethasone injection (steroid)1,242$0$1
Epoetin alfa injection (Retacrit) for anemia920$6$30
Anti-nausea injection (Aloxi/palonosetron)890$1$122
Injection, granisetron hydrochloride, 100 mcg580$0$25
Injection of additional new drug or substance into vein425$12$105
Injection, carboplatin, 50 mg372$2$300
Injection, pegfilgrastim-apgf (nyvepria), biosimilar, 0.5 mg372$93$157
Administration of chemotherapy into vein, 1 hour or less281$100$686
Drug injection, under skin or into muscle253$11$93
Injection, gadobenate dimeglumine (multihance), per ml170$1$16
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min)150$65$148
Infusion into a vein for therapy, prevention, or diagnosis, additional sequential infusion, 1 hour or less121$22$152
Infusion into a vein for therapy, prevention, or diagnosis, 1 hour or less107$48$304
Administration of additional new drug or substance into vein, 1 hour or less107$50$334
New patient office visit (45-59 min)103$129$343
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg98$1$5
Administration of chemotherapy into vein, each additional hour94$22$156
Office visit, established patient, complex (40-54 min)89$134$301
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 125 mg75$4$26
Infusion into a vein for therapy, prevention, or diagnosis, each additional hour74$16$97
Administration of non-hormonal anti-neoplastic chemotherapy under skin or into muscle69$55$205
Fluorodeoxyglucose f-18 fdg, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 45 millicuries61$409$638
Nuclear medicine study from skull base to mid-thigh with ct scan57$1,208$4,120
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg54$6$462
Ct scan of chest with contrast37$97$1,005
Blood creatinine level35$5$30
Administration of hormonal anti-neoplastic chemotherapy under skin or into muscle30$24$141
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg30$1$19
Administration of additional new drug or substance into vein using push technique28$43$281
CT scan of chest, without contrast25$83$861
Irrigation of implanted venous access drug delivery device24$19$111
Initial hospital admission, high complexity23$140$412
Collection of blood sample from implanted device20$19$64
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast19$228$1,400
Infusion into a vein for hydration, 31-60 minutes19$25$249
Injection of drug or substance into vein19$27$240
Hospital follow-up visit, moderate complexity18$57$157
Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066)16$42$226
Initial hospital admission, moderate complexity13$89$297
New patient office visit, complex (60-74 min)11$138$432
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
19.2% high complexity
79.1% medium
1.7% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$3,296
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $471/year across 7 years
Bottom 44% in FL for hematology & oncology
45
Companies
170
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$2,972 (90.2%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$323 (9.8%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$300
2023
$377
2022
$341
2021
$231
2020
$28
2019
$447
2018
$1,572

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
$391
PFIZER INC.
$343
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.
$259
Astellas Pharma US Inc
$255
Janssen Biotech, Inc.
$249
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc
$234
Celgene Corporation
$112
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
$101
Amgen Inc.
$92
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
$88
GENZYME CORPORATION
$83
Genentech USA, Inc.
$81
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
$79
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.
$78
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
$57
Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company
$52
ABBVIE INC.
$50
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$47
Boston Scientific Corporation
$43
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
$43
Lilly USA, LLC
$43
Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
$39
TerSera Therapeutics LLC
$38
Myovant Sciences Inc.
$33
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$31
Seattle Genetics, Inc.
$29
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$27
Incyte Corporation
$27
Seagen Inc.
$26
CSL Behring
$26
EMD Serono, Inc.
$25
Kite Pharma, Inc.
$22
Stemline Therapeutics Inc.
$21
Tempus AI, Inc
$21
Eisai Inc.
$21
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
$18
BeiGene USA, Inc.
$18
MEDIVATION FIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
$13
SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.
$13
R-Pharm US LLC
$13
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
$12
Exelixis Inc.
$12
Epizyme, Inc.,
$12
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
$11
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc
$9
Top 3 companies account for 30.1% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ADCETRIS · Afstyla · Aranesp · BENDEKA · BOSULIF · BRUKINSA · Balversa · Bavencio · CABLIVI · CEREZYME · CYRAMZA · Cabometyx · DARZALEX · Erleada · Fabhalta · GAUCHER-DISEASE · GAZYVA · GILOTRIF · IBRANCE · IMBRUVICA · IMFINZI · INJECTAFER · INLYTA · Imbruvica · Ixempra · JADENU · JAKAFI · KEYTRUDA · KISQALI · KRAZATI · Kyprolis · LIBTAYO · Lenvima · MEKINIST · MYLOTARG · Neulasta · OCREVUS · OGSIVEO · OPDIVO · ORGOVYX · Onivyde · Orserdu · PLUVICTO · PROMACTA · Perjeta · Pomalyst · REBLOZYL · RYDAPT · Revlimid · SANCUSO · SOLIRIS · SUTENT · Somatuline Depot · TAGRISSO · TASIGNA · TAXOTERE · TAZVERIK · TECENTRIQ · VENCLEXTA · VOTRIENT · WATCHMAN · WATCHMAN Access System · XALKORI · XT CDX · XTANDI · Xermelo · Xtandi · ZOLADEX · clonoSEQ
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (90%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $3 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a hematology & oncology in Pensacola?
Compare hematology & oncologys in the Pensacola area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse hematology & oncologys nearby

Geographic Context

Hematology & Oncologys within 10 mi
20
Per 100K population
6.2
County median income
$65,715
Nearest hospital
BAPTIST HOSPITAL
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2024
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Poiesz is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 6% in FL), and low-engagement industry engagement, with 18 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Poiesz experienced with filgrastim injection (nivestym) for white blood cells?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Poiesz performed 30,180 filgrastim injection (nivestym) for white blood cells services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Poiesz receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Poiesz received a total of $3,296 from 45 companies across 170 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Poiesz's costs compare to other hematology & oncologys in Pensacola?
Dr. Poiesz's average Medicare payment per service is $12. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Poiesz) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →