Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Gregg Baran, MD

Radiation Oncology · Pensacola, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
5151 N 9TH AVE, Pensacola, FL 32504
8504167000
In practice since 2006 (20 years)
NPI: 1104885573 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Baran from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Baran? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Baran

Dr. Gregg Baran is a radiation oncology specialist in Pensacola, FL, with 20 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Baran performed 8,701 Medicare services across 2,719 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Baran received a total of $275 from 3 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 5 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Baran is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice ▲ Top 22% volume in FL $275 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
8,701
Medicare services
Top 22% in FL for radiation oncology
2,719
Unique beneficiaries
$16
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~435 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 5,281 $0 $1
Injection, gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agent, not otherwise specified (nos), per ml 771 $1 $4
Chest X-ray, 2 views 359 $16 $118
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast 166 $105 $903
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 138 $50 $463
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast 119 $43 $583
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 108 $13 $95
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 104 $23 $122
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast 94 $152 $1,376
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 79 $17 $94
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 76 $18 $97
Chest X-ray, 1 view 74 $8 $132
Mri scan of brain without contrast 69 $121 $953
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue 69 $72 $260
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 68 $16 $130
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 67 $22 $149
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 59 $17 $100
CT scan of chest, without contrast 56 $72 $560
Ct scan of soft tissue of neck with contrast 51 $96 $665
Mri scan of upper spinal canal without contrast 51 $114 $837
Ct scan of face without contrast 50 $69 $515
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 44 $40 $620
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 41 $14 $97
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast 38 $132 $1,138
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast 37 $107 $1,243
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views 33 $7 $136
X-ray of ribs on side of body, minimum of 3 views 31 $15 $122
Mri scan of lower spinal canal before and after contrast 27 $139 $1,339
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 27 $137 $1,071
Mri scan of middle spinal canal without contrast 26 $87 $901
X-ray of middle spine, 3 views 25 $19 $100
Ct scan of soft tissue of neck before and after contrast 24 $61 $856
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast 23 $41 $632
X-ray of both hips, minimum of 5 views 23 $35 $152
Ct scan of middle spine without contrast 21 $40 $614
Imaging for evaluation of swallowing function 20 $19 $255
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 19 $12 $100
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 19 $18 $66
Ct scan of chest with contrast 18 $53 $685
Ct scan of cranial cavity without contrast 17 $90 $644
Ct scan of soft tissue of neck without contrast 17 $84 $592
Mri scan of blood vessels of head without contrast 17 $45 $705
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 17 $89 $1,037
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 17 $22 $382
X-ray of shoulder, 1 view 15 $7 $119
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views 15 $11 $93
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 15 $46 $401
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 14 $87 $1,270
X-ray of upper spine, 2-3 views 14 $16 $128
X-ray of upper arm, minimum of 2 views 14 $10 $96
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views 13 $27 $135
Ct scan of lower spine with contrast 13 $45 $662
Mri scan of upper spinal canal before and after contrast 13 $132 $1,481
Mri scan of middle spinal canal before and after contrast 13 $85 $1,359
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 13 $13 $123
Ct scan of leg without contrast 13 $36 $590
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views 12 $13 $98
Single contrast x-ray of esophagus 12 $23 $238
Mri scan of bone of eye socket, face, and/or neck before and after contrast 11 $79 $1,246
X-ray of upper spine, 6 or more views 11 $38 $161
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$275
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $92/year across 3 years
Top 44% in FL for radiation oncology
3
Companies
5
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$275 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$154
2023
$21
2018
$100

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Inari Medical, Inc.
$154
Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
$100
Boston Scientific Corporation
$21
Top 3 companies account for 100.0% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
Endurant · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · S · WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $3 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Pensacola?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Pensacola area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
37
Per 100K population
11.4
County median income
$65,715
Nearest hospital
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Baran is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 22% in FL), with low-engagement industry engagement, with 20 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Baran experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Baran performed 5,281 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Baran receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Baran received a total of $275 from 3 companies across 5 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Baran's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Pensacola?
Dr. Baran's average Medicare payment per service is $16. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Baran) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →