Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Adarsh Verma, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · Miami, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Mixed engagement
8900 N KENDALL DR, Miami, FL 33176
7865965990
In practice since 2006 (19 years)
NPI: 1548335987 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Verma from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Verma? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Verma

Dr. Adarsh Verma is a radiation oncology specialist in Miami, FL, with 19 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Verma performed 10,710 Medicare services across 2,938 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Verma received a total of $23,798 from 29 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 234 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Verma is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 19 years in practice ▲ Top 19% volume in FL $23,798 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
10,710
Medicare services
Top 19% in FL for radiation oncology
2,938
Unique beneficiaries
$7
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~564 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 7,690 $0 $3
Chest X-ray, 1 view 941 $7 $47
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 349 $30 $219
Chest X-ray, 2 views 189 $8 $56
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 143 $7 $47
Use of a drug to induce depression of consciousness by physician performing a procedure (5 years or older), initial 15 minutes 70 $10 $63
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 69 $16 $114
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 62 $34 $275
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 61 $66 $467
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow 53 $30 $207
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 52 $8 $57
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views 51 $6 $45
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 49 $26 $189
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 42 $26 $179
CT scan of chest, without contrast 40 $105 $626
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views 39 $6 $43
Imaging of urinary tract following injection of a contrast agent 39 $19 $89
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 35 $7 $48
Imaging for evaluation of swallowing function 33 $18 $137
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 33 $22 $151
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 32 $8 $57
X-ray of thigh bone, 1 view 28 $5 $43
Knee X-ray, 3 views 28 $6 $48
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 27 $6 $43
X-ray of hip, 1 view 26 $7 $48
Ct scan of chest with contrast 22 $92 $820
X-ray of spine, 1 view 22 $6 $40
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 22 $230 $1,202
Ultrasonic guidance for blood vessel access 22 $12 $74
Aspiration of fluid from chest cavity using imaging guidance 21 $78 $588
Drainage of fluid from abdominal cavity using imaging guidance 21 $82 $568
Ct scan of face without contrast 21 $30 $219
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast 21 $63 $450
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast 18 $66 $450
Mri scan of brain without contrast 18 $56 $379
X-ray of upper spine, 2-3 views 18 $7 $57
X-ray of abdomen, 2 views 17 $8 $70
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 17 $143 $906
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 16 $6 $45
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast 16 $81 $581
Insertion of non-tunneled central venous tube for infusion (5 years or older) 15 $68 $637
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast 15 $38 $280
3d radiographic procedure 15 $7 $50
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement 15 $24 $165
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views 14 $8 $81
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 14 $6 $45
X-ray of ribs on side of body, minimum of 3 views 13 $10 $70
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening 13 $137 $338
X-ray of shoulder, 1 view 13 $5 $41
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 13 $6 $45
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 13 $6 $45
Review by radiologist of ct guidance for needle placement 13 $56 $294
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views 12 $4 $43
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast 12 $271 $1,458
Review by radiologist of image from tube placement into bile duct using an endoscope 12 $9 $183
Ct scan of abdominal aorta and both leg arteries with contrast 12 $204 $1,237
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min) 12 $52 $259
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 11 $287 $2,077
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
0.1% high complexity
82.0% medium
17.9% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$23,798
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $3,400/year across 7 years
Top 4% in FL for radiation oncology
29
Companies
234
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$11,345 (47.7%)
Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$7,438 (31.3%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$5,014 (21.1%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$7,290
2023
$1,035
2022
$6,771
2021
$1,498
2020
$1,374
2019
$4,618
2018
$1,212

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Inari Medical, Inc.
$14,474
Medtronic USA, Inc.
$2,634
Penumbra, Inc.
$2,530
Boston Scientific Corporation
$2,190
Stryker Corporation
$383
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
$263
Radius Health, Inc.
$235
Cook Medical LLC
$144
Sirtex Medical Inc
$136
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$126
DePuy Synthes Sales Inc.
$122
Ethicon US, LLC
$113
Imperative Care, Inc
$68
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
$66
PFIZER INC.
$43
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$42
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
$28
AngioDynamics, Inc.
$26
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
$24
Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
$20
CMS Imaging, Inc.
$18
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
$17
Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc.
$17
Cook Incorporated
$16
Biocompatibles, Inc.
$16
Medtronic, Inc.
$15
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
$12
EKOS Corporation
$12
Endocare, Inc.
$8
Top 3 companies account for 82.5% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
3D Revascularization · ACE · CATALYST · COOK MEDICAL CATHETERS · COOK MEDICAL ZILVER PTX · COVERA · CT THROMBECTOMY SYSTEM KIT · Certus 140 · EKOSONIC · ELIQUIS · ELUVIA · EMBOLD Fibered · EMBOTRAP · EPIQ 7G · FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER · FlowTriever · GENERAL ATHERECTOMY · GENERAL EMBOLICS · GENERAL EMBOLICS · GENERAL THERAPIES · GLIDEPATH · GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with Heparin · General - Embolics · Indigo · Indigo System · KYPHON Balloon Kyphoplasty · LAVA LES (Liquid Embolic System) · LUTONIX · OPTABLATE · OSTEOCOOL RF ABLATION · OSTEOCOOL RF ABLATION SYSTEM · Penumbra System · RUBY Coil · Ranger · S · SIR-Spheres Microspheres · SOLERO · SPINEJACK · SYMPHONY CATHETER · Solitaire · SpiderFX · THERASPHERE · TREVO · TRINAV INFUSION SYSTEM · TRUSELECT · TheraSphere Y90 Glass Microspheres 10 GBq · Tymlos · VENOVO · Varian CRYOCARE TOUCH System · WavelinQ · ZILVER PTX
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (48%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians. Total industry engagement is in the top 4% for radiation oncology in FL.

Equivalent to $222 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Miami?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Miami area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
366
Per 100K population
13.6
County median income
$68,694
Nearest hospital
BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Verma is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 19% in FL), with mixed engagement industry engagement in the top 4% of FL peers, with 19 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Verma experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Verma performed 7,690 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Verma receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Verma received a total of $23,798 from 29 companies across 234 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Verma's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Miami?
Dr. Verma's average Medicare payment per service is $7. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Verma) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →