Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Elvin Dennington, M.D.

Radiation Oncology · Melbourne, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
1775 W HIBISCUS BLVD, Melbourne, FL 32901
3218373820
In practice since 2006 (19 years)
NPI: 1518971415 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Dennington from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Dennington? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Dennington

Dr. Elvin Dennington is a radiation oncology specialist in Melbourne, FL, with 19 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Dennington performed 6,768 Medicare services across 4,091 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Dennington received a total of $34 from 1 pharmaceutical and/or device company across 1 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Dennington is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 19 years in practice ▲ Top 27% volume in FL $34 industry payments

Florida License Status

FL DOH · MQA
1
Active license
None
Board action on record
0
Recent admin complaints
Profession License # Status Expires Board Action
Medical Doctor 117693 Clear January 31, 2028
Data from Florida Department of Health Medical Quality Assurance. License records are public under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Verify directly on FL DOH →

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
6,768
Medicare services
Top 27% in FL for radiation oncology
4,091
Unique beneficiaries
$25
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~356 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) 2,485 $0 $1
Chest X-ray, 1 view 744 $7 $31
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 364 $31 $143
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 278 $22 $68
Chest X-ray, 2 views 226 $21 $66
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 181 $28 $91
Screening mammography 168 $120 $251
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 166 $28 $89
3D screening mammography (tomosynthesis) 141 $50 $105
Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066) 138 $40 $105
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 122 $36 $173
Knee X-ray, 3 views 114 $23 $81
Diagnostic mammography of both breasts 89 $113 $309
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 86 $67 $315
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 80 $23 $72
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 78 $63 $296
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 72 $20 $67
Limited ultrasound scan of 1 breast 72 $63 $174
Diagnostic mammography of 1 breast 65 $86 $245
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 62 $23 $79
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 62 $17 $82
Mri scan of brain without contrast 58 $54 $238
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 57 $27 $79
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views 56 $22 $66
3d radiographic procedure 51 $8 $50
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast 49 $63 $297
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast 49 $64 $293
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 39 $22 $67
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers 39 $26 $131
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast 38 $35 $165
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast 35 $84 $390
Mri scan of leg joint without contrast 35 $129 $414
Mri scan of arm joint without contrast 34 $150 $413
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast 27 $117 $394
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 26 $18 $61
Computed tomography (ct) of brain blood flow, volume, and timing of flow analysis with contrast 24 $172 $250
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 23 $19 $59
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen 23 $87 $231
CT scan of chest, without contrast 22 $104 $270
X-ray of upper spine, 2-3 views 21 $27 $78
Mri scan of leg without contrast 19 $49 $225
Ct scan of face without contrast 18 $30 $166
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views 18 $7 $32
Ct scan of leg without contrast 16 $37 $170
Complete ultrasound scan of 1 breast 16 $41 $256
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 16 $22 $107
Limited ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 16 $36 $117
X-ray of middle spine, 3 views 15 $24 $77
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow 15 $29 $132
Ct scan of middle spine without contrast 14 $34 $168
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 14 $6 $33
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 13 $84 $880
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 13 $53 $216
Ct scan of chest with contrast 11 $116 $338
Mri scan of upper spinal canal without contrast 11 $139 $392
Mri scan of lower spinal canal before and after contrast 11 $88 $367
X-ray of both hips, 3-4 views 11 $41 $105
Mri scan of leg before and after contrast 11 $83 $342
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 11 $242 $621
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2021 ↗
$34
Total received (2021-2021)
Bottom 18% in FL for radiation oncology
1
Company
1
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$34 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2021
$34

Payments by company (2021)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc
$34
Top 3 companies account for 100.0% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
XARELTO
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $0 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Melbourne?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Melbourne area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
51
Per 100K population
8.2
County median income
$75,817
Nearest hospital
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2021
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Dennington is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 27% in FL), with low-engagement industry engagement, with 19 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Dennington experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Dennington performed 2,485 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Dennington receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Dennington received a total of $34 from 1 company across 1 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Dennington's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Melbourne?
Dr. Dennington's average Medicare payment per service is $25. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Dennington) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →