Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Andre Graves, D.O

Radiation Oncology · Melbourne, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice— Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
1350 HICKORY STREET, Melbourne, FL 32901
3214347000
In practice since 2009 (16 years)
NPI: 1205079506 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Graves from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Graves? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Graves

Dr. Andre Graves is a radiation oncology in Melbourne, FL, with 16 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Graves performed 25,607 Medicare services across 4,277 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Graves received a total of $38 from 1 pharmaceutical and/or device company across 1 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Graves is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 16 years in practice▲ Top 9% volume in FL$ $38 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
25,607
Medicare services
Top 9% in FL for radiation oncology
4,277
Unique beneficiaries
$7
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~1,600 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)12,950$0$1
MRI contrast dye injection (gadoterate)8,420$0$1
Chest X-ray, 1 view1,019$7$32
Chest X-ray, 2 views416$22$66
CT scan of chest, without contrast148$97$271
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views125$23$68
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views122$27$79
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views121$31$89
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers120$17$83
Imaging for evaluation of swallowing function105$21$92
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast104$36$175
Knee X-ray, 3 views101$28$80
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen86$75$230
Foot X-ray, 3+ views77$21$67
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue76$76$219
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views74$34$90
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers68$27$130
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast65$63$307
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity61$76$215
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast57$67$307
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast57$232$622
Limited ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity50$42$117
Ct scan of chest with contrast49$113$339
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views47$24$73
X-ray of upper spine, 2-3 views45$28$78
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view41$20$59
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast41$144$375
3d radiographic procedure41$7$50
Mri scan of abdomen without contrast40$55$249
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening37$132$279
Mri scan of brain without contrast36$52$253
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views36$22$66
Bone density scan (DEXA)35$10$36
Ct scan of leg without contrast28$34$170
Computed tomography (ct) of brain blood flow, volume, and timing of flow analysis with contrast26$178$250
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast26$80$215
X-ray of middle spine, 2 views26$22$65
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen25$22$110
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views24$26$73
Ct scan of blood vessels of abdomen and pelvis with contrast24$75$731
Mri scan of abdomen before and after contrast24$271$694
Double contrast x-ray of esophagus24$25$114
X-ray of ribs on side of body, minimum of 3 views23$27$83
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views22$7$33
Ct scan of heart with evaluation of blood vessel calcium22$77$200
3d radiographic procedure with computerized image postprocessing21$30$116
X-ray of middle spine, 3 views20$26$74
X-ray lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views bending views20$28$80
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views20$25$80
Nuclear medicine study of lung ventilation and circulation20$40$181
Ct scan of soft tissue of neck with contrast19$138$377
Ct scan of pelvis without contrast19$42$180
Mri scan of pelvis before and after contrast18$246$694
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast17$170$516
Ct scan of face without contrast16$95$259
Mri scan of blood vessels of head without contrast16$46$204
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast16$247$696
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast15$88$381
Ct scan of middle spine without contrast15$37$172
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast15$96$261
X-ray of shoulder, 1 view15$6$25
X-ray of both hips, 3-4 views15$41$105
X-ray of abdomen, minimum of 3 views15$22$84
Complete ultrasound scan of pelvis15$72$209
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow15$31$137
X-ray of abdomen, 2 views14$8$37
Ultrasound scan of uterus, ovaries, tubes, cervix and pelvic area through vagina14$85$236
X-ray of pelvis, 1-2 views13$17$52
Single contrast x-ray of small intestine13$31$96
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views12$19$64
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views12$20$58
Ultrasound scan of abdominal aorta12$102$209
Single contrast x-ray of esophagus11$24$113
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2021 ↗
$38
Total received (2021-2021)
Bottom 21% in FL for radiation oncology
1
Company
1
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$38 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2021
$38

Payments by company (2021)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc
$38
Top 3 companies account for 100.0% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
XARELTO
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $0 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology in Melbourne?
Compare radiation oncologys in the Melbourne area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologys nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation Oncologys within 10 mi
51
Per 100K population
8.2
County median income
$75,817
Nearest hospital
HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2021
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Graves is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 9% in FL), and low-engagement industry engagement, with 16 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Graves experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Graves performed 12,950 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Graves receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Graves received a total of $38 from 1 company across 1 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Graves's costs compare to other radiation oncologys in Melbourne?
Dr. Graves's average Medicare payment per service is $7. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Graves) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →