Medicare Enrolled

Dr. David Graham, MD

Radiology - Diagnostic · Lakeland, FL
Practice pattern: Clinical Cardiology— Primarily office-based clinical cardiology
Low-engagement
1730 LAKELAND HILLS BLVD, Lakeland, FL 33805
8636807780
In practice since 2005 (20 years)
NPI: 1699766881 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Graham from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Graham? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Graham

Dr. David Graham is a radiology - diagnostic in Lakeland, FL, with 20 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Graham performed 8,713 Medicare services across 1,870 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Graham received a total of $2,676 from 18 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 40 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiology - diagnostic. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Graham is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice▲ Top 9% volume in FL$ $2,676 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
8,713
Medicare services
Top 9% in FL for radiology - diagnostic
1,870
Unique beneficiaries
$196
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~436 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session2,437$269$961
CT guidance for radiation therapy2,094$92$293
Continuing radiation therapy consultation per week638$65$200
Radiation treatment management, 5 treatment sessions616$149$618
Calculation of radiation therapy dose553$51$166
Stereoscopic x-ray guidance for localization of target volume for the delivery of radiation therapy287$57$182
Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 6-10 mev247$174$548
Design and construction of complex radiation treatment device204$95$325
Radiation treatment delivery,3 or more separate treatment areas, custom blocking, tangential ports, wedges, rotational beam, compensators, electron beam; 11-19 mev185$175$617
Cranial lesion surgery using radiation over multiple sessions167$753$3,323
Obtaining data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment, 3 or more treatment areas or any number of treatment areas where special treatment is involved160$337$1,221
Design and construction of radiation treatment device for high precision radiation therapy156$356$1,085
Complex radiation therapy planning142$131$425
High precision radiation therapy planning134$1,384$4,181
New patient office visit (45-59 min)131$126$299
High dose radiation therapy, 2-12 channels125$458$1,471
Special radiation treatment115$109$830
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min)66$59$132
Obtaining respiratory data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment42$313$1,053
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)36$100$194
Management of cranial lesion surgery using radiation over multiple sessions35$508$1,611
Obtaining data needed to develop the optimal radiation treatment, 1 treatment area29$203$671
Injection of biodegradable material next to prostate21$111$440
Placement of device in prostate for radiation therapy21$39$259
Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement21$24$83
Special medical radiation therapy consultation21$106$301
Initial hospital admission, high complexity18$137$372
3d radiation therapy planning12$367$2,020
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
2.3% high complexity
66.6% medium
31.1% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$2,676
Total received (2019-2024)
Avg $535/year across 5 years
Top 24% in FL for radiology - diagnostic
18
Companies
40
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$2,502 (93.5%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$174 (6.5%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$926
2023
$1,380
2022
$194
2021
$123
2019
$53

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
$1,014
Boston Scientific Corporation
$626
BIOPROTECT MEDICAL, INC.
$268
PFIZER INC.
$137
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$123
Astellas Pharma US Inc
$100
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
$99
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$80
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
$46
ADC Therapeutics America, Inc.
$29
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
$22
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$22
Eisai Inc.
$21
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$20
Bioventus LLC
$19
Janssen Biotech, Inc.
$17
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
$17
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
$16
Top 3 companies account for 71.3% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
BIOPROTECT BALLOON IMPLANT SYSTEM · Enhertu · Erleada · Exogen · FOTIVDA · ICLUSIG · INLYTA · LUTATHERA · Lenvima · Nubeqa · PLUVICTO · SCEMBLIX · SPACEOAR VUE · SpaceOAR VUE System - 10mL · Stivarga · Varian Ethos Treatment Planning · XTANDI · Xofigo
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (94%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $31 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiology - diagnostic in Lakeland?
Compare radiology - diagnostics in the Lakeland area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiology - diagnostics nearby

Geographic Context

Radiology - Diagnostics within 10 mi
9
Per 100K population
1.2
County median income
$63,644
Nearest hospital
LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2024
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Graham is a clinical cardiology specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 9% in FL), and low-engagement industry engagement, with 20 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Graham experienced with intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Graham performed 2,437 intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Graham receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Graham received a total of $2,676 from 18 companies across 40 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Graham's costs compare to other radiology - diagnostics in Lakeland?
Dr. Graham's average Medicare payment per service is $196. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Graham) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →