Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Nehu Patel, MD

Nuclear Cardiology Physician · Jacksonville, FL
Practice pattern: Remote Monitoring— Significant remote device monitoring activity
Speaking/Promotional
14534 OLD SAINT AUGUSTINE RD STE 3420, Jacksonville, FL 32258
9044938001
In practice since 2006 (20 years)
NPI: 1629030325 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Patel from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Patel? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Patel

Dr. Nehu Patel is a nuclear cardiology physician in Jacksonville, FL, with 20 years in practice. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Patel performed 10,533 Medicare services across 4,896 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Patel received a total of $8,135 from 30 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 107 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in nuclear cardiology physician. The majority of payments are for speaking programs and promotional activities, reflecting participation in industry-sponsored events. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Patel is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 20 years in practice▲ Top 5% volume in FL$ $8,135 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
10,533
Medicare services
Top 5% in FL for nuclear cardiology physician
4,896
Unique beneficiaries
$82
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~527 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

ProcedureVolumeAvg. paidAvg. submitted
Intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ecg monitoring; without exercise, per session3,525$92$272
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)1,590$93$320
Intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ecg monitoring with exercise, per session1,175$91$272
Echocardiogram, transthoracic717$51$175
Ultrasound study of arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers377$142$467
Electrocardiogram (EKG), 12-lead316$11$69
Hospital follow-up visit, moderate complexity298$62$179
Exercise or drug-induced heart stress test with electrocardiogram (ecg) with supervision by physician274$16$55
Exercise or drug-induced heart stress test with electrocardiogram (ecg) with review by physician272$11$37
Nuclear medicine studies of heart muscle at rest and with stress and spect243$58$195
Anticoagulant management of patient taking warfarin195$8$29
Prothrombin time test (blood clotting)178$4$11
EKG interpretation and report127$6$30
Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers112$92$297
Ultrasound of heart, follow-up108$19$63
New patient office visit (45-59 min)101$123$423
Ultrasound of heart with color-depicted blood flow, rate and valve function96$2$8
Initial hospital admission, moderate complexity87$104$341
Initial hospital care with straightforward or low level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 40 minutes81$65$256
Laser destruction of incompetent vein of arm or leg using imaging guidance62$766$2,546
Physician review, interpretation, and patient management of home inr testing for patient with either mechanical heart valve(s), chronic atrial fibrillation, or venous thromboembolism who meets medicare coverage criteria; testing not occurring more frequent62$7$21
Ultrasound of heart blood flow, valves and chambers, follow-up57$6$19
Heart muscle strain imaging56$9$94
Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-day continuous with review by health care professional43$14$47
Ultrasound of heart with probe in esophagus, with report40$81$269
Ultrasound of heart blood flow, valves and chambers39$13$45
Office visit, established patient, complex (40-54 min)35$134$454
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow33$26$101
Destruction of first incompetent vein of arm or leg using radiofrequency and imaging guidance32$844$2,788
Electrocardiogram (ecg) up to 30 days continuous with symptom monitoring, transmission and review and report by health care professional31$19$63
Office visit, established patient (20-29 min)30$67$228
External shock to heart to regulate heart beat24$84$391
Electrocardiogram (ecg) up to 30 days continuous with review and report by health care professional24$20$66
Hospital follow-up visit, high complexity22$89$258
New patient office visit (30-44 min)17$63$283
Laser destruction of incompetent veins of arm or leg using imaging guidance, subsequent15$239$778
Injection of chemical agent into single incompetent vein of leg using ultrasound guidance14$1,009$3,338
Hospital follow-up visit, low complexity13$37$98
Initial hospital admission, high complexity12$139$499
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
9.2% high complexity
15.6% medium
75.2% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$8,135
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $1,162/year across 7 years
Top 29% in FL for nuclear cardiology physician
30
Companies
107
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$4,949 (60.8%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$3,186 (39.2%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$316
2023
$533
2022
$641
2021
$461
2020
$1,738
2019
$1,764
2018
$2,682

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
AngioDynamics, Inc.
$5,096
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
$740
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
$336
ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp)
$282
PFIZER INC.
$232
Medtronic, Inc.
$222
HeartFlow, Inc.
$198
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc
$127
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$125
CVRx, Inc.
$98
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
$75
Boston Scientific Corporation
$73
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
$72
Chiesi USA, Inc.
$63
Amgen Inc.
$57
Baxter Healthcare
$54
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
$48
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
$38
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.
$32
LANTHEUS MEDICAL IMAGING, INC.
$22
GENZYME CORPORATION
$18
Kestra Medical Technology Services, Inc.
$18
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$16
Novo Nordisk Inc
$16
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$15
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.
$14
SCPHARMACEUTICALS INC.
$14
Bardy Diagnostics, Inc.
$12
Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
$12
CashFlow Solutions, LLC
$7
Top 3 companies account for 75.9% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
AngioVac · Assure WCD · Barostim Neo System · COBALT DR MRI SURESCAN · Carnation Ambulatory Monitor · ClosureFast · DEFINITY · ELIQUIS · EMBLEM · ENTRESTO · EVLT · FARXIGA · FFRct · FUROSCIX · HawkOne · Hillrom - Cardiac Ambulatory Monitor · Hillrom - Carnation Ambulatory Monitor · IVUS Systems · Inpefa · JARDIANCE · KENGREAL · LEQVIO · LINQ II · LYMPHA PRESS OPTIMAL PLUS(US) BT · LifeVest · MULTAQ · ONPATTRO · OPSUMIT · PRALUENT · Repatha · Rybelsus · VARITHENA · VERQUVO · VYNDAQEL · WATCHMAN · WATCHMAN Access System · XARELTO
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (61%) are for speaking programs and promotional activities, which reflect participation in industry-sponsored educational or marketing events. This is common in nuclear cardiology physician and does not inherently indicate bias, but patients may wish to be aware.

Equivalent to $77 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a nuclear cardiology physician in Jacksonville?
Compare nuclear cardiology physicians in the Jacksonville area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse nuclear cardiology physicians nearby

Geographic Context

Nuclear Cardiology Physicians within 10 mi
7
Per 100K population
0.7
County median income
$68,447
Nearest hospital
ASCENSION ST VINCENT'S ST JOHNS COUNTY
4.9 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPESWeekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOSMonthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util.Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open PaymentsCY 2024
Disciplinary History— Not publicN/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Patel is a remote monitoring specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 5% in FL), and speaking/promotional industry engagement, with 20 years of practice experience.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Patel experienced with intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ecg monitoring; without exercise, per session?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Patel performed 3,525 intensive cardiac rehabilitation; with or without continuous ecg monitoring; without exercise, per session services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Patel receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Patel received a total of $8,135 from 30 companies across 107 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Patel's costs compare to other nuclear cardiology physicians in Jacksonville?
Dr. Patel's average Medicare payment per service is $82. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Patel) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →