Medicare Enrolled

Dr. John Mawn, M.D

Radiation Oncology · Fort Walton Beach, FL
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Low-engagement
1000 MAR WALT DR, Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547
8143354131
In practice since 2012 (14 years)
NPI: 1528333887 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Mawn from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Mawn? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Mawn

Dr. John Mawn is a radiation oncology specialist in Fort Walton Beach, FL, with 14 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Mawn performed 5,270 Medicare services across 4,962 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Mawn received a total of $75 from 2 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 3 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. Most payments are for meals and travel — low-value interactions common across virtually all practicing physicians. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Mawn is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. This is not a quality rating. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 14 years in practice ▲ Top 33% volume in FL $75 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
5,270
Medicare services
Top 33% in FL for radiation oncology
4,962
Unique beneficiaries
$24
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · Not a quality rating · How to read this →
~376 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
3D screening mammography (tomosynthesis) 784 $28 $41
Screening mammography 779 $36 $49
Chest X-ray, 1 view 587 $7 $14
Bone density scan (DEXA) 543 $9 $20
Chest X-ray, 2 views 227 $8 $17
Diagnostic digital breast tomosynthesis, unilateral or bilateral (list separately in addition to 77065 or 77066) 157 $20 $41
Diagnostic mammography of 1 breast 133 $29 $52
Limited ultrasound scan of 1 breast 127 $25 $55
X-ray of knee, 4 or more views 116 $8 $20
Complete ultrasound scan of 1 breast 114 $34 $99
Shoulder X-ray, 2+ views 89 $7 $16
Hip X-ray, 2-3 views 86 $8 $20
Knee X-ray, 3 views 85 $7 $16
CT scan of head/brain, without contrast 81 $29 $68
Diagnostic mammography of both breasts 72 $32 $65
Foot X-ray, 3+ views 66 $6 $13
X-ray of wrist, minimum of 3 views 60 $6 $14
CT scan of chest, without contrast 56 $38 $84
Nuclear medicine study from skull base to mid-thigh with ct scan 56 $88 $201
X-ray of ankle, minimum of 3 views 47 $6 $14
Ultrasound of both sides of head and neck blood flow 43 $27 $59
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, minimum of 4 views 41 $9 $26
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis without contrast 40 $62 $138
CT scan of abdomen and pelvis with contrast 39 $61 $146
X-ray of hand, minimum of 3 views 38 $6 $14
Nuclear medicine studies of heart muscle at rest and with stress and spect 38 $57 $167
Ct scan of upper spine without contrast 37 $34 $87
Ct scan of blood vessels of chest with contrast 34 $60 $156
Ct scan of blood vessels of head with contrast 32 $63 $141
Low dose ct scan of chest for lung cancer screening 31 $51 $68
X-ray of wrist, 2 views 31 $6 $15
X-ray of abdomen, 1 view 31 $7 $18
X-ray of hand, 2 views 30 $6 $13
Complete ultrasound scan behind abdominal cavity 30 $22 $60
Ct scan of blood vessels of neck with contrast 29 $61 $142
Biopsy of breast and placement of locating device using ultrasound, first growth 27 $117 $219
Imaging of urinary tract following injection of a contrast agent 27 $17 $31
Ultrasound scan of head and neck soft tissue 27 $18 $45
Complete ultrasound scan of abdomen 25 $24 $66
Mri scan of brain before and after contrast 24 $78 $191
X-ray of thigh bone, minimum 2 views 23 $7 $15
Double contrast x-ray of upper digestive tract 22 $31 $56
Ct scan of chest with contrast 20 $42 $101
Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast 20 $55 $122
X-ray of foot, 2 views 20 $6 $12
Biopsy of breast and placement of locating device using x-ray with needle, first growth 18 $128 $230
X-ray of middle spine, 3 views 18 $9 $17
X-ray of lower and sacral spine, 2-3 views 18 $8 $20
X-ray of knee, 1-2 views 18 $6 $16
X-ray of lower leg, 2 views 16 $6 $14
Limited ultrasound scan of abdomen 16 $19 $47
Ct scan of face without contrast 15 $30 $92
X-ray of both hips, minimum of 5 views 15 $11 $27
X-ray of upper spine, 4-5 views 14 $10 $26
Mri scan of both breasts 14 $62 $165
X-ray of elbow, minimum of 3 views 13 $6 $14
X-ray series of abdomen with single x-ray of chest 13 $12 $25
Review by radiologist of bile and/or pancreatic duct image during surgery 13 $7 $30
Mri scan of brain without contrast 12 $50 $120
Ct scan of lower spine without contrast 11 $36 $82
X-ray of finger, minimum of 2 views 11 $5 $11
Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis before and after contrast 11 $73 $160
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
0.2% high complexity
20.0% medium
79.8% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2022 ↗
$75
Total received (2021-2022)
Avg $38/year across 2 years
Bottom 29% in FL for radiation oncology
2
Companies
3
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$75 (100.0%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2022
$16
2021
$59

Payments by company (2022)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Change Healthcare Technologies, LLC
$46
HOLOGIC INC
$29
Top 3 companies account for 100.0% of total payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
AFFIRM PRONE BIOPSY SYSTEM · Change Healthcare Radiology Solutions · SELENIA DIMENSIONS 3D SYSTEM
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

Most payments (100%) are for meals and travel — low-value interactions that are common across virtually all practicing physicians.

Equivalent to $1 per 100 Medicare services performed
Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Fort Walton Beach?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Fort Walton Beach area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
19
Per 100K population
8.9
County median income
$79,097
Nearest hospital
HCA FLORIDA FORT WALTON-DESTIN HOSPITAL
0.0 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2022
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This measures how much public data is available about a provider — not how good they are. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Mawn is a mixed practice specialist, with moderate Medicare volume, with low-engagement industry engagement.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data. It describes data availability and patterns — not clinical quality. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Mawn experienced with 3d screening mammography (tomosynthesis)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Mawn performed 784 3d screening mammography (tomosynthesis) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Mawn receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Mawn received a total of $75 from 2 companies across 3 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Mawn's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Fort Walton Beach?
Dr. Mawn's average Medicare payment per service is $24. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Mawn) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. The Transparency Score measures data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →