Medicare Enrolled

Dr. Edward Gerstenfeld, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · San Francisco, CA
Practice pattern: Remote & Electrophysiology — Practice combining remote and electrophysiology services
Consulting-driven
400 PARNASSUS AVE, San Francisco, CA 94143
4154765706
In practice since 2006 (19 years)
NPI: 1972531788 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Gerstenfeld from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Gerstenfeld? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Gerstenfeld

Dr. Edward Gerstenfeld is a cardiovascular disease specialist in San Francisco, CA, with 19 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Gerstenfeld performed 961 Medicare services across 551 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Gerstenfeld received a total of $152,484 from 17 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 224 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in cardiovascular disease. The majority of payments are for consulting, which typically reflects recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Gerstenfeld is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 19 years in practice ▲ 961 Medicare services $152,484 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
961
Medicare services
Bottom 32% in CA for cardiovascular disease
Lower Medicare volume may reflect subspecialty focus, hospital-based work, or a higher share of non-Medicare patients.
551
Unique beneficiaries
$73
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · How to read this →
~51 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Remote pacemaker monitoring, 90 days
Remote assessment of a pacemaker system, including single, dual, multiple lead, or leadless devices, performed up to 90 days apart.
262 $24 $176
Remote cardiac rhythm monitor evaluation, up to 30 days
Review and analysis of data from a remote cardiac rhythm monitoring system over a period of up to 30 days.
159 $22 $156
EKG interpretation and report
A standard electrocardiogram test that records the heart's electrical activity using at least 12 leads. The service includes a professional interpretation of the results and a written report.
124 $7 $47
Remote evaluation of implantable defibrillator system
Remote assessment of a single, dual, or multiple lead implantable defibrillator system within 90 days of the previous evaluation.
104 $28 $359
New patient office visit, complex (60-74 min) 65 $147 $1,085
Pacemaker programming, dual lead system
Adjustment and configuration of a dual-lead pacemaker device to ensure proper operation and settings.
48 $28 $238
External shock to heart to regulate heart beat
A procedure that delivers an electric shock to the heart from outside the body to restore a normal heart rhythm.
30 $97 $1,353
Office visit, established patient, complex (40-54 min)
An office or outpatient visit for an existing patient lasting between 40 and 54 minutes. This level of service is determined by the total time spent on the date of the encounter.
30 $147 $773
Atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation
A procedure to treat atrial fibrillation by mapping the heart's electrical activity and destroying tissue causing irregular contractions. This is done by isolating the pulmonary veins using catheter-based destruction.
29 $806 $5,593
Office visit, established patient (30-39 min)
A follow-up office visit for an existing patient lasting between 30 and 39 minutes. The visit involves medical evaluation and management of the patient's condition.
24 $121 $577
Programming of single lead implantable defibrillator system
Adjustment and testing of the settings for a single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to ensure proper function.
22 $34 $257
Programming of dual lead implantable defibrillator system
Adjustment and testing of the settings for an implanted heart device with two leads to ensure proper function.
17 $51 $317
Telephone medical discussion, 21-30 minutes
A telephone conversation with a physician lasting between 21 and 30 minutes. This code covers the time spent discussing medical matters over the phone.
13 $81 $183
Ultrasound of heart blood vessels with radiologist review
An ultrasound exam that evaluates blood vessels within the heart, including a review of the results by a radiologist.
12 $68 $864
Radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia
A procedure to locate and destroy abnormal heart tissue in the upper chambers of the heart that causes a rapid heart rate.
11 $716 $4,164
Hospital discharge day management, 30 minutes or less
This service covers the final day of hospital care when the patient is being discharged. It includes coordination of care and instructions for the patient within a time frame of 30 minutes or less.
11 $67 $391
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
51.3% high complexity
1.2% medium
47.5% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2024 ↗
$152,484
Total received (2018-2024)
Avg $21,783/year across 7 years
Top 5% in CA for cardiovascular disease
A higher payment rank reflects disclosed industry relationships (consulting, research, speaking) common among subspecialists — not wrongdoing.
17
Companies
224
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$94,520 (62.0%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$55,300 (36.3%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$2,663 (1.7%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2024
$35,822
2023
$25,700
2022
$16,319
2021
$31,707
2020
$3,646
2019
$19,960
2018
$19,329

Payments by company (2024)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
Boston Scientific Corporation
$19,723
Abbott Laboratories
$9,953
Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
$2,700
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$2,500
Biosense Webster, Inc.
$501
Medtronic, Inc.
$411
CARDIVA MEDICAL, INC.
$34
Top 3 companies account for 90.4% of 2024 payments
All-time payments by company (2018-2024) ›
Boston Scientific Corporation
$40,737
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
$25,578
Abbott Laboratories
$21,833
Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
$17,746
Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
$12,448
Biosense Webster, Inc.
$9,364
Medtronic, Inc.
$8,962
CardioFocus, Inc.
$5,275
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$4,300
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
$3,864
BIOTRONIK INC.
$2,149
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
$100
Adagio Medical, Inc.
$49
CARDIVA MEDICAL, INC.
$34
ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp)
$21
Amgen Inc.
$12
Medtronic USA, Inc.
$11
Top 3 companies account for 57.8% of all-time payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
ADVISOR · AGILIS HISPRO · ASSURITY · AURORA EV-ICD MRI SURESCAN · AVEIR · AZURE XT DR MRI SURESCAN · Acticor 7 VR-T DX · Azure · CARDIVA VASCADE MVP VVCS 6-12F · CARTO 3 · CareLink · Carto 3 · Carto 3 System · CartoSound · Cobalt · EMBLEM · ENSITE · ENSITE PRECISION · Ensite Cardiac Mapping System · Farapulse · GENERAL THERAPIES · GENERAL THERAPIES · GENERAL - EP · GENERAL THERAPIES · General - EP · General - Therapies · LifeVest · MICRA · Micra · NUVISION ICE CATHETER · OCTARAY MAPPING CATHETER · PRADAXA · PlasmaBlade · QDOT MICRO Catheter · Quadra Assura CRT Defibrillator · RESONATE · Repatha · SENSOR ENABLED · TACTICATH ABLATION CATHETER · TENDRIL · THERAPIES · VERQUVO
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (62%) are consulting fees, which typically reflect recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Total industry engagement is in the top 5% for cardiovascular disease in CA.

Looking for a cardiovascular disease specialist in San Francisco?
Compare cardiologists in the San Francisco area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse cardiologists nearby

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2024
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This reflects how much public data is available about a provider. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Gerstenfeld is a remote & electrophysiology specialist, with moderate Medicare volume, with consulting-driven industry engagement in the top 5% of CA peers, with 19 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data, describing data availability and patterns. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Gerstenfeld experienced with remote pacemaker monitoring, 90 days?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Gerstenfeld performed 262 remote pacemaker monitoring, 90 days services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Gerstenfeld receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Gerstenfeld received a total of $152,484 from 17 companies across 224 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Gerstenfeld's costs compare to other cardiologists in San Francisco?
Dr. Gerstenfeld's average Medicare payment per service is $73. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Gerstenfeld) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. Data Coverage reflects data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →