Medicare Enrolled

Dr. John Finn, MD

Radiation Oncology · Los Angeles, CA
Practice pattern: Mixed Practice — Diverse clinical practice across multiple procedure types
Consulting-driven
100 UCLA MEDICAL PLZ STE 100, Los Angeles, CA 90024
3103016800
In practice since 2006 (19 years)
NPI: 1619054533 verify on NPPES ↗
Very High
DATA COVERAGE
Data in 4 of 4 federal sources
Measures public federal data availability — not provider quality
Informational, not a quality rating. This page presents federal public records about Dr. Finn from CMS (NPPES, Open Payments, Medicare Provider Utilization, PECOS). It is not medical advice, an endorsement, or a judgment of clinical quality. Always consult the provider directly and a licensed clinician for medical decisions. Read methodology →
Are you Dr. Finn? Request a correction or review of any data shown here. Provider portal →

What this data tells you about Dr. Finn

Dr. John Finn is a radiation oncology specialist in Los Angeles, CA, with 19 years of NPI registration. Based on federal Medicare data, Dr. Finn performed 32,200 Medicare services across 492 unique beneficiaries.

Between the years covered by Open Payments, Dr. Finn received a total of $13,127 from 7 pharmaceutical and/or device companies across 22 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common in radiation oncology. The majority of payments are for consulting, which typically reflects recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Patients may wish to discuss these relationships with their provider.

The Data Coverage level for Dr. Finn is Very High — reflecting how much public federal data is available about this provider. Patients are encouraged to use this data as one of several factors when choosing a healthcare provider.

✓ 19 years in practice ▲ Top 5% volume in CA $13,127 industry payments

Medicare Practice Summary

Medicare Utilization ↗
32,200
Medicare services
Top 5% in CA for radiation oncology
492
Unique beneficiaries
$2
Avg. Medicare payment
Medicare patients only (65+ / disabled) · How to read this →
~1,695 Medicare services per year of practice

Top procedures by volume

Ranked by number of services performed for Medicare patients. Avg. submitted charge is what the provider billed; avg. Medicare payment is what CMS paid.

Procedure Volume Avg. paid Avg. submitted
Contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)
A contrast agent containing 300-399 mg/ml of iodine used to enhance imaging studies. It is administered per milliliter to improve the visibility of internal structures.
17,801 $0 $5
MRI contrast dye injection (gadoterate)
Administration of gadoterate meglumine, a contrast agent, in a 0.1 ml dose.
5,300 $0 $1
Iron infusion (Feraheme)
An injection of ferumoxytol used to treat iron deficiency anemia in patients not on dialysis.
4,621 $0 $10
MRI contrast dye injection (gadobutrol) 4,200 $0 $16
CT scan of heart blood vessels and grafts with contrast
A CT scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed images of the heart's blood vessels and any surgical grafts.
89 $259 $3,576
CT scan of chest blood vessels with contrast
A CT scan that uses contrast dye to create detailed images of the blood vessels in the chest.
34 $195 $2,831
MRI of heart with and without contrast
A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the heart performed both before and after the administration of a contrast dye to enhance image detail.
33 $318 $3,739
MRI of chest blood vessels
An MRI scan that uses magnetic fields and radio waves to create detailed images of the blood vessels in the chest.
28 $287 $2,984
MRI of heart blood flow
An MRI scan that visualizes the flow of blood within the heart.
27 $44 $1,602
CT scan of abdominal and pelvic blood vessels with contrast
A computed tomography scan that uses contrast dye to visualize the blood vessels in the abdomen and pelvis.
22 $340 $3,131
MRI of abdominal blood vessels
An MRI scan that creates detailed images of the blood vessels in the abdomen.
18 $251 $3,277
Chest X-ray, 1 view
An X-ray image of the chest taken from a single angle. This imaging test is used to visualize the structures within the chest cavity.
14 $8 $36
MRI of pelvic blood vessels
A magnetic resonance imaging scan used to visualize the blood vessels in the pelvic area.
13 $295 $2,961
How to read this data: This reflects Medicare patients only (typically 65+). Payment amounts are what Medicare paid the provider, not your out-of-pocket cost. A higher procedure volume generally indicates more experience with that procedure.
14.4% high complexity
85.6% medium
0.0% routine

Industry Payment Transparency

Open Payments through 2023 ↗
$13,127
Total received (2018-2023)
Avg $2,188/year across 6 years
Top 7% in CA for radiation oncology
A higher payment rank reflects disclosed industry relationships (consulting, research, speaking) common among subspecialists — not wrongdoing.
7
Companies
22
Individual payments
All payments are legal and publicly reported · Not evidence of wrongdoing · How to interpret →

Payment profile

Industry payments classified by relationship type. Not all payments are equal — research and consulting reflect different relationships than speaking programs or meals.

Consulting
Expert advisory fees, typically reflecting recognized clinical expertise
$11,757 (89.6%)
Meals & Travel
Food, beverages, travel, and lodging — typically low-value
$1,130 (8.6%)
Speaking / Promotional
Speaker programs, honoraria, and industry-sponsored educational events
$240 (1.8%)

Payment trend by year

Annual totals from pharmaceutical and medical device companies.

2023
$1,873
2022
$6,003
2021
$294
2020
$135
2019
$4,711
2018
$111

Payments by company (2023)

Consulting
Speaking
Meals & Travel
Research
GUERBET LLC
$1,528
AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$165
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$133
HeartFlow, Inc.
$48
Top 3 companies account for 97.5% of 2023 payments
All-time payments by company (2018-2023) ›
BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS INC.
$6,088
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
$4,400
GUERBET LLC
$1,528
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
$521
AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$508
HeartFlow, Inc.
$48
UIH Solutions LLC
$34
Top 3 companies account for 91.5% of all-time payments
Associated products mentioned in payments ›
Elucirem · FERAHEME · FFRct · Isovue · MAGNETOM Sola · MAGNETOM Vida 3T · MultiHance · ProHance · uMR570
Should you be concerned? Payments from pharmaceutical and device companies are legal and common — 57% of U.S. physicians receive at least one. They often reflect legitimate consulting, research, or education. What matters is whether a recommended drug or device appears in your doctor's payment records. If so, consider asking your doctor about it. How to interpret this data →

The majority of payments (90%) are consulting fees, which typically reflect recognized clinical expertise sought by manufacturers. Total industry engagement is in the top 7% for radiation oncology in CA.

Looking for a radiation oncology specialist in Los Angeles?
Compare radiation oncologists in the Los Angeles area by procedure volume, costs, and industry payment transparency.
Browse radiation oncologists nearby

Geographic Context

Radiation oncologists within 10 mi
1,012
Per 100K population
10.3
County median income
$87,760
Nearest hospital
RONALD REAGAN UCLA MEDICAL CENTER
0.6 mi

Data Sources

Provider Registry NPPES Weekly updates
Medicare Enrollment PECOS Monthly updates
Practice Data Medicare Util. Annual (CY lag)
Industry Payments Open Payments CY 2023
Disciplinary History — Not public N/A

This provider has data in 4 of 4 available federal datasets, with a Data Coverage level of Very High. This reflects how much public data is available about a provider. How we calculate this →

Summary

Dr. Finn is a mixed practice specialist, with above-average Medicare volume (top 5% in CA), with consulting-driven industry engagement in the top 7% of CA peers, with 19 years of NPI registration.

This summary is auto-generated from federal data, describing data availability and patterns. Read our methodology →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dr. Finn experienced with contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based)?
Based on Medicare claims data, Dr. Finn performed 17,801 contrast dye for imaging (iodine-based) services. Research suggests that higher procedure volume is often associated with better outcomes, particularly for complex procedures. Note that Medicare data only captures patients aged 65 and older, so the total practice volume across all patients is likely higher.
Does Dr. Finn receive payments from pharmaceutical companies?
Yes. Dr. Finn received a total of $13,127 from 7 companies across 22 individual payments. These payments are legal, publicly disclosed under the federal Sunshine Act, and common among physicians — 57% of all U.S. physicians receive at least one industry payment. Patients may wish to ask their doctor about these relationships, especially if a recommended drug or device appears in the payment records.
How do Dr. Finn's costs compare to other radiation oncologists in Los Angeles?
Dr. Finn's average Medicare payment per service is $2. Note that these figures represent what Medicare pays, not your out-of-pocket cost, which depends on your specific insurance plan and deductible. Procedure-level data above shows both what was submitted and what Medicare paid for each service type.
What does Data Coverage mean?
Data Coverage (currently Very High for Dr. Finn) measures how much public federal data is available about a provider. It is not a quality rating. A "Very High" or "High" level means the provider has data across multiple federal sources (NPPES, PECOS, Medicare Utilization, Open Payments), indicating a long track record of practice, Medicare participation, and industry disclosure. A "Low" or "Moderate" level may simply mean the provider is newer, does not see Medicare patients, or has not received any industry payments — none of which are inherently negative. Read our full methodology →
Is this data up to date?
Each data source has its own update cycle. Provider registry data (NPPES) is updated weekly. Medicare enrollment (PECOS) is updated monthly. Medicare practice data has a ~2 year lag — the most recent available is typically 2 years prior. Industry payment data (Open Payments) is published annually, usually in June, covering the prior calendar year. We display the data date prominently on each section so you always know how current it is. See our data freshness policy →
About this page

All data on this page is sourced verbatim from public federal records published by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): NPPES ↗, Open Payments ↗, Medicare Provider Utilization ↗, and PECOS. Publication is mandated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (§6002 ACA, 42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h) and the Freedom of Information Act.

This page is not medical advice, an endorsement, a recommendation, or a quality rating. Data Coverage reflects data completeness — how much federal information exists for this provider — not clinical performance, patient outcomes, or quality of care. Always verify information directly with the provider and consult a licensed clinician before making medical decisions.

Provider corrections: Provider portal · Privacy questions: Privacy Policy · Terms: Terms of Use · Methodology: Methodology

Data Disclaimer — Data sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), Open Payments program, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, and Provider Enrollment & Certification data (PECOS). Published under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by CMS, HHS, or the U.S. Government. Data may contain errors as reported to CMS by providers and reporting entities. Payments from industry are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Medicare data reflects only patients aged 65+ or those with qualifying disabilities. For corrections, contact CMS directly. This information does not constitute medical advice and should not be used as the sole basis for choosing a healthcare provider. Procedure descriptions use plain language and do not reference CPT® codes, which are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. Full methodology → · Report a data error → · Privacy policy →