Specialty Directory
Radiation Oncology in Columbus, GA
Federal CMS data for 9 radiation oncology providers practicing in Columbus, GA. Includes Medicare utilization, Open Payments industry funding, and PECOS enrollment status.
9
Providers
Median industry payments
$325
9
Radiation Oncology Providers
in Columbus, GA
$325
Median Industry Payments
per provider (2018–2024)
3,906
Median Medicare Services
fee-for-service claims
How to read this directory: Providers are listed by Medicare service volume, which reflects only
Medicare fee-for-service patients (typically 65+). This does not represent total practice volume.
Industry payments span multiple years and payment types; disclosure alone establishes neither wrongdoing nor legality.
Radiation Oncology includes multiple subspecialties with different practice patterns.
Learn more →
Radiation Oncology Providers
NPPES · Open Payments · Medicare| Provider | Medicare Volume | Beneficiaries* | Top Procedure | Industry Payments | Payment Type | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BENASHVILI, GEORGE MD | 14,771 | — | MRI contrast dye injection (gadoterate) | $0 | — | High |
| FERRIS, JEREMY M.D. | 12,477 | — | MRI contrast dye injection (gadoterate) | $325 (2018-2024) | — | Very High |
| CUTRONE, JOHN M.D. | 6,632 | — | 3D screening mammography (tomosynthesis) | $950 (2018-2024) | — | Very High |
| BRIGHT, STEVEN M.D. | 4,635 | — | Chest X-ray, 1 view | $1,800 (2018-2023) | — | Very High |
| KERSEY, CAMERON M.D. | 3,906 | — | MRI of lower spine, without contrast | $134,063 (2018-2023) | — | Very High |
| HENSON, NICHOLAS M.D. | 3,874 | — | Chest X-ray, 1 view | $0 | — | High |
| DE QUADROS, NISHANT M.D. | 2,577 | — | Chest X-ray, 1 view | $2,141 (2018-2024) | — | Very High |
| STAY, ROURKE MD | 2,541 | — | Chest X-ray, 1 view | $97 (2019-2019) | — | Very High |
| HOWARD, MARSEEA M.D. | 917 | — | 3D screening mammography (tomosynthesis) | $260 (2019-2024) | — | Very High |
Note: Radiation Oncology encompasses multiple subspecialties with different practice patterns.
Differences in payment amounts and procedure volumes may reflect subspecialty focus
rather than practice quality. Consider viewing individual profiles for full context.