State Specialty Directory
Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician in TX
Federal CMS data for 5 clinical & laboratory dermatological immunology physician providers across TX. Includes Medicare utilization, Open Payments industry funding, and PECOS enrollment status.
5
Providers
Median industry payments
$5,011
5
Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician Providers
in TX
$5,011
Median Industry Payments
per provider (2018–2024)
1,287
Median Medicare Services
fee-for-service claims
How to read this directory: Providers are listed by Medicare service volume, which reflects only Medicare fee-for-service patients (typically 65+). This does not represent total practice volume. Industry payments span multiple years and payment types — they are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician includes multiple subspecialties with different practice patterns. Learn more →
Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician Providers — TX
NPPES · Open Payments · Medicare| Provider | City | Medicare Volume | Beneficiaries* | Top Procedure | Industry Payments | Payment Type | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAICH, ADRIENNE MD | HOUSTON | 5,793 | 2,767 | Destruction of precancerous skin growths, 2-14 | $15,493 (2018-2024) | Food & Beverage (99%) | Very High |
| HEBERTON, MEGHAN M.D. | DALLAS | 1,883 | 1,300 | Destruction of precancerous skin growths, 2-14 | $2,177 (2018-2024) | Honoraria (86%) | Very High |
| COOPER, RANI M.D. | KATY | 1,287 | 642 | Destruction of precancerous skin growths, 2-14 | $5,011 (2018-2024) | Food & Beverage (100%) | Very High |
| MOORE, TODD MD, PA | ARLINGTON | — | — | — | $13,259 (2018-2024) | Food & Beverage (100%) | Moderate |
| SMITH, SCOTT MD | HOUSTON | — | — | — | $257 (2018-2024) | Food & Beverage (100%) | Moderate |
Note: Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician encompasses multiple subspecialties with different practice patterns. Differences in payment amounts and procedure volumes may reflect subspecialty focus rather than practice quality. Consider viewing individual profiles for full context.